aria
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 17,543
- Reaction score
- 16,793
First downs? That’s the new measuring stick? Wow, you’re really getting desperate to come up with things to defend him.Blah blah blah.. 91 first downs vs 50 first downs.. 13-3 vs 5-11... Coincidence.. I think not.. All that speed and elusiveness and dancing around really worked out well for Barkley didn't it?
I have never once touted any football player as having single handedly done anything ... Every player, regardless of how good he is, is only 1 of 11 on the field at any given time. The Giants "improved" from 5-11 Barkley's rookie year to 4-12 his second year.. Halelujah! They look like they may be able to match or exceed that this year.. without him. Wonder if they will move on from him next year too..
It’s ridiculous that you think Barkley could have somehow done more to improve their record and you conveniently failed to mention that he played with a high ankle sprain most of last season, missed 3 games and still got over a 1K yards. He also had a rookie QB most of the season who happened to lead the league in turnovers, I guess all those INT’s and fumbles were Barkley’s fault as well?
It’s also ironic that you’v been using the O line as an excuse for zeke but now you claim that the Giants O line wasn’t as bad as the stats suggest and try to blame it on Barkley. That’s rich! Have you ever thought that maybe he “danced around too much” because he had nowhere to run behind the O line? I know that’s hard for you to believe and I’m sure you have a list of more excuses but at least he tries to make something happen with nothing whereas zeke would be content or too slow do to much more than plow into a defender for a couple yards.