Zimmer Good or Bad, Stay or Go

[Banned_n_austin]

Well I think Parcells wants to go to the 4-3 so that way Zimmer will get even more lost then he already is and then Parcells can go to Jerry and say how stupid Zimmer is and how he needs a DC who actually knows somethin about football. ITs that easy.

Newsflash Slappy!!!

They were already running the 4-3.

And Parcells is the administrator. He can hire and fire any coach he choses.

OH my sides!!!!!

 

[Wolverine]

So I made a mistake. What does it matter any cuz Zimmer SUCKS at any kinda defense he would run anyway.

 

[LoneStar22]

Zimmer must go.

 

[big dog cowboy]

Zimmer sucks. He is a glorified secondary coach. He has risen in power due to coaching vacancies only. Being an "inside guy" and one of "Jimmy's guys" thru the years has made him a "oh he was one of Jimmy's coaches so he HAS to know what he is doing" kind of guy. Promotions are supposed to be earned not given out like candy on Halloween. Just by sticking in Dallas and not accepting any other jobs, his stock seems to have risen. Even without any real progress made on the field by any of the units he "coached."

Oh yeah, I'm proudly still a GROZ menber.

 

[Wolverine]

Zimmer must go.

Aight!!! Someone who knows what they are talkin about!!

Zimmer sucks. He is a glorified secondary coach. He has risen in power due to coaching vacancies only. Being an "inside guy" and one of "Jimmy's guys" thru the years has made him a "oh he was one of Jimmy's coaches so he HAS to know what he is doing" kind of guy. Promotions are supposed to be earned not given out like candy on Halloween. Just by sticking in Dallas and not accepting any other jobs, his stock seems to have risen. Even without any real progress made on the field by any of the units he "coached."

Oh yeah, I'm proudly still a GROZ menber.

And yet another one who knows what they are talkin about. Thanks bdc!!





Ahhh look at that. No response from Banned in Austin. Guess he knows hes wrong and with more people comin out agains Zimmer he aint got nothin to say. You lose!

 

[Banned_n_austin]

Aight!!! Someone who knows what they are talkin about!!

And it aint you!!!

Ahhh look at that. No response from Banned in Austin. Guess he knows hes wrong and with more people comin out agains Zimmer he aint got nothin to say. You lose!

Hey I wasn't the one that said we are 'switching to the 4-3 TWICE - you did.



OH MY SIDES!!!!

 

[Banned_n_austin]

So I made a mistake. What does it matter any cuz Zimmer SUCKS at any kinda defense he would run anyway.

For some reason I don't think it was a mistake, rather ignorance of the subject.

 

[jobberone]

Let's see. Parcells actually just let Zimmer and all his coaches do anything they want anytime they want. And never says anything about it. No coaches meetings. And he didn't fire Zimmer but did others. And the defense sucked because Zimmer just didn't play the proper people with the proper schemes and call the right plays and the right time.

Gosh, Parcells is stupid for keeping such a stupid coach. And Jerry is stupid for keeping them all.

And I guess we're stupid because Dallas loses. It's actually probably all our fault. After all we do call most of the shots around here anyway.

 

[Wolverine]

And it aint you!!!

Uhh yes it is. Look at how many other people here think Zimmer sucks and so I know Im right. But hey when your wrong and Im right like the others in here its all good.

Hey I wasn't the one that said we are 'switching to the 4-3 TWICE - you did.



OH MY SIDES!!!!

You know what I meant so I mad a mistake when I typed it. But your one to talk cuz look who is wrong about Zimmer.....YOU!!!!! But then you are alway wrong about everything anyway so you should be used to it.

 

[Banned_n_austin]

Uhh yes it is. Look at how many other people here think Zimmer sucks and so I know Im right. But hey when your wrong and Im right like the others in here its all good.

:jerk:

You know what I meant so I mad a mistake when I typed it. But your one to talk cuz look who is wrong about Zimmer.....YOU!!!!! But then you are alway wrong about everything anyway so you should be used to it.

Dude, you don't know the difference between a 3-4 and 4-3.

Just out of curiousity. . .how did we have the #1 ranked defense in 2003?

 

[jksmith269]

Let's see. Parcells actually just let Zimmer and all his coaches do anything they want anytime they want. And never says anything about it. No coaches meetings. And he didn't fire Zimmer but did others. And the defense sucked because Zimmer just didn't play the proper people with the proper schemes and call the right plays and the right time.

Gosh, Parcells is stupid for keeping such a stupid coach. And Jerry is stupid for keeping them all.

And I guess we're stupid because Dallas loses. It's actually probably all our fault. After all we do call most of the shots around here anyway.

IMO......we may be able to better than Zimmer "MAY" but I know we can do a lot worse...BP has groomed some very good coaches and I think he knows more than any of us if Zimmer is suited for the job......If he didn't think he was the man for the job then last offseason he wouldn't have talked him into staying.....

That being said I can see both sides no we don't get enough pressure with our D-line if they were as good as they should be we wouldn't need to Blitz as much as some want..and some of us would still gripe.....If we have a D as good as in 03 next season then we make the playoffs hands down if we have a better O than last seasons I can see us winning the East...Laugh if you want but that is what I think...

 

[Banned_n_austin]

Hey village we all know you mean the 3-4 at least we hope you do.............if not you need to change the pic on your ribbon......LOL J\J everyone makes mistakes

 

[Wolverine]

Just out of curiousity. . .how did we have the #1 ranked defense in 2003?

Oh that is easy. Ill explain it so even you can understand. We had a real weak schedule that year. But of course you dont bring up how the few good teams we played lit up our D and you dont bring up how we were last or near last in sacks QB pressures tackles for losses and turnovers. But I wouldnt expect you to know anything about that. You dont know anythin about football.




Hmmmm do ya hear that. Silence. Been waiting for Banneds response but nothin but silence. He got owned.

 

[Banned_n_austin]

Oh that is easy. Ill explain it so even you can understand. We had a real weak schedule that year. But of course you dont bring up how the few good teams we played lit up our D and you dont bring up how we were last or near last in sacks QB pressures tackles for losses and turnovers. But I wouldnt expect you to know anything about that. You dont know anythin about football.

Forcing teams to punt and keeping them out of the endzone are just as important, if not more important than QB pressures or sacks.

Total yards given up is what I look at. That means the defense is doing it's job - stopping the opposing offense.

As far as the schedule goes, it's the NFL, no teams are weak IMO.

OH. . and I love the 'you don't know anything about football". .

I DO know the difference between the 3-4 and the 4-3. I wasn't the one who said we were 'switching to the 4-3' TWICE in the same thread.

 

[LoneStar22]

Forcing teams to punt and keeping them out of the endzone are just as important, if not more important than QB pressures or sacks.

Total yards given up is what I look at. That means the defense is doing it's job - stopping the opposing offense.

All Parcells.... :grin2:

 

[Wolverine]

Forcing teams to punt and keeping them out of the endzone are just as important, if not more important than QB pressures or sacks.

Total yards given up is what I look at. That means the defense is doing it's job - stopping the opposing offense.

As far as the schedule goes, it's the NFL, no teams are weak IMO.

OH. . and I love the 'you don't know anything about football". .

I DO know the difference between the 3-4 and the 4-3. I wasn't the one who said we were 'switching to the 4-3' TWICE in the same thread.

Wow it took you forever to come up with this lamer. Id rather have QB pressure sacks and turnovers. Usually the team with the most turnovers wins the game but you take your weak Zimmer D that sucks. Maybe if we got more pressure and turnovers we would be better. But I dont expect you to figure that one out. So what if our D stops WEAK teams cuz it didnt stop any good teams that is for sure. Turnovers screw up the other teams confidnce more then the weak ol just stoppin em. But I dont expect you to GET IT!!!





Ha ha ha. Look at that Banned ran off. He knows he lost and couldnt deal with it.

 

[2233boys]

Zimmer bad he must go!

 

[2233boys]

Originally Posted by Banned_n_austin
Total yards given up is what I look at. That means the defense is doing it's job - stopping the opposing offense.

Total yrds means nothing if you are giving up points remember a couple years ago when one of Zimmer's defense was 3 or 4th in the league defensivly that was with total yrds, Dallas was like 20th in points allowed.

A good defense is one that doesn't yeild a lot of yrds and points, and creates plays i.e. turnovers, sacks, etc. By that standard we haven't had a good defense in years. Personally I blame Zimmer... Well, and Jerry of course.

 

[Wolverine]

Total yrds means nothing if you are giving up points remember a couple years ago when one of Zimmer's defense was 3 or 4th in the league defensivly that was with total yrds, Dallas was like 20th in points allowed.

A good defense is one that doesn't yeild a lot of yrds and points, and creates plays i.e. turnovers, sacks, etc. By that standard we haven't had a good defense in years. Personally I blame Zimmer... Well, and Jerry of course.

I totally agree. But Banned_n_Austin just cant figure this out. But that is why he ran off he knew he was losin this one.

 

[Seven]

Ok, Ok fellas. You will all look like fools. I KNOW what the problem is/was.
It was the gatorade makin' kid. It's his fault, and also the fault of the head cheerleader chick/person. She has the cheerleaders way to close to the field of play.
Ya see...
The "kid" had been slippin viagra into the coolers while making the gatorade and with the "chicks" so near, what with all dancin' and shakin' and the wearing of the skimpy-wimpy outfits, the Defense was physically slowin' down due a binding effect commonly referred to as stuff-ious pant-a-lonas. NOT to mention the loss of blood from the cranium at an alarming rate of speed. In addition they had to adjust their tackling techniques just a smidge. This scenerio could answer all of the critics questions. No if ands or buts.
Oh yes....the"kid" was good. Real good.

Are we all better now? Cmon, group hug and a round of Jesus loves me. Let's go.