Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
but Steve Spagnuolo was not?
hmmm, sounds like a cop-out for being re-buffed to me
hmmm, sounds like a cop-out for being re-buffed to me
he was probably telling him that a back can run in more than just a straight-lineCNY Cowboy;2236054 said:I thought it was kinda cute when Portis was explaining plays to him on the sideline .:laugh2:
Spagnuolo ran from that mess.Bob Sacamano;2236043 said:but Steve Spagnuolo was not?
hmmm, sounds like a cop-out for being re-buffed to me
Bob Sacamano;2236085 said:I wonder if Danny is going to plop a steaming pile of icecream on Zorn's desk
jobberone;2236100 said:Wow. One game and you guys are running him out of town. He actually kept his team in it despite being over matched and underquarter-backed.
The Skins are looking like a team that has drafted poorly over the years. They have noticably less talent than NY.
jobberone;2236100 said:Wow. One game and you guys are running him out of town. He actually kept his team in it despite being over matched and underquarter-backed.
The Skins are looking like a team that has drafted poorly over the years. They have noticably less talent than NY.
DaBoys4Life;2236107 said:did you even watch the game??????
Bob Sacamano;2236121 said:if you heard what Vinny Cerrato had to say about why Spagnuolo wasn't hired to be the Skin HC
you would understand
Cowboys22;2236111 said:What happened was soo obvious. They wanted Spags but he was smart enough to take the interview so his name was out there as a head coach candidate but he backed off and wanted nothing to do with that cluster-F of a team. They talked to a few other people but quickly found out that noone of significance even wanted the job. They were literally forced to hand the job to Zorn who admittingly was in total shock. He has looked way in over his head for 3-4 weeks now once teams started taking games more seriously.
jobberone;2236128 said:Every bit of it. You guys are so intent on blasting the other team I don't think you give the players credit when due. You don't have to be a fan of a team to see the talent on them.
How can you take one game and prognosticate anything substantial?
Last year the SB Champs (God I hate having to say that) lost their first two games and were down at the half to the Skins 17-3. They came back and won that game and unfortunately we know the rest. And they looked bad.
I see more talent than I'd like on the Giants. And I see some talent on the Skins who seem to be playing the same defense pretty well despite losing a very good DC.
So what part of it do you disagree with?
Or is all you can say is the Skin's suck?
The jokes ARE funny at times.