morat1959
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,885
- Reaction score
- 9,691
At least we’d have a QB to build around. We have nothing now.I believe if we had a different QB we would be close
But he is to worried about anything other than football
At least we’d have a QB to build around. We have nothing now.I believe if we had a different QB we would be close
But he is to worried about anything other than football
If Dak was on the Eagles team would they still have won the SB?Yet teams that actually win Superbowls build around their qb's, no matter how talented they are (Mahomes, Brady) or how much they make (Hurts).
Its almost like yall are more content with blaming Dak, than with winning SB's.
I was preaching about his “brain power” when he was in college.He doesn't have the brain power to think like that, he is just a me, me, me type of person.
Is the Strawman your go-to argument?Yet teams that actually win Superbowls build around their qb's, no matter how talented they are (Mahomes, Brady) or how much they make (Hurts).
It’s almost like yall are more content with blaming Dak, than with winning SB's.
Basket Weaving 101 is just as good as his Workforce Management crap. He cannot even manage a damn football game without sweating his butt off.I was preaching about his “brain power” when he was in college.
All the QBs you mentioned are light-years ahead of Dak...who will probably languish in the lowest quartile of his position peers in 2025-26 as his skills continue to diminish.Yet teams that actually win Superbowls build around their qb's, no matter how talented they are (Mahomes, Brady) or how much they make (Hurts).
Its almost like yall are more content with blaming Dak, than with winning SB's.
If Dak was on the Eagles team would they still have won the SB?
So yall should be all about building a better team around then... right?All the QBs you mentioned are light-years ahead of Dak...who will probably languish in the lowest quartile of his position peers in 2025-26 as his skills continue to diminish.
If by "Strawman" you mean building a good team around your QB and winning the SB like every team has done the last 100 years... sure.Is the Strawman your go-to argument?
![]()
![]()
If they ran the ball like they did then maybe but he has a tendency to throw the ball to the other team, how many pick 6 did he throw the year before last ?
If by "Strawman" you mean building a good team around your QB and winning the SB like every team has done the last 100 years... sure.
Kin folks, a Ms.St fan, a plant or something that’s not related to the level of play from the QB position in pro football. No other answer will fit.You really love Dak, huh? The question is, why?
I suspected it would be bafflement. Maybe we should wait for the next Dak topic....."Dak visits the School for the Blind and says hi to a reporter."What?
Glad you mentioned Cee Dee for that too. Diggs didn't say it, DLawrence didn't say it, never heard Romo say it......so it would be epic and applauding for Dak to say it. Fair enough. At least Micah is hinting such, but probably to the chagrin of his agent in minding and tending to his own business. Interesting.I want Prescott, Parsons and CeeDee to put pressure on the Jones boys to figure out how to use free agency, trades along with the draft to stack the roster.
Joe Burrow has done it. He was speaking of the Eagles and said..."The Eagles are paying everybody," Burrow said. "That seems like the way to go, whatever they're doing."
That statement by Burrow can be interpreted as him saying pay Chase, pay Higgins, pay Hendrickson, get other players and pay them, too. This is what I need the Cowboys stars to be saying. It will keep Stephen Jones from always trying to blame them for why they choose not to get more talent in outside of the draft.
Say what Burrow said, Prescott!
....and Micah would need that same guy in the parking lot. Just sayin'.Where is the dude that beat the crap of Prescott in the parking lot of a college game. Dak needs another adjustment because he's running his mouth.
Start with the premise that nobody is privy to your internal monologue and go from there and it might be easier to understand what you mean. My reading comprehension is pretty strong but your previous post to me read like I was being introduced into a shower argument somewhere in the middle.I suspected it would be bafflement. Maybe we should wait for the next Dak topic....."Dak visits the School for the Blind and says hi to a reporter."
Contrary nate dizzle. I'm fully ok with being disagreeable or different in kind. No convincing intended or elevated status. All good. I merit your post just as mine are with responses. Beauty of the board. Keep posting nate dizzle.Start with the premise that nobody is privy to your internal monologue and go from there and it might be easier to understand what you mean. My reading comprehension is pretty strong but your previous post to me read like I was being introduced into a shower argument somewhere in the middle.