that's a real possibility
I’ll take Watson here.Deshawn Watson better get that contract done now before they see him without Hopkins
its Monday. Lets see if they do other maneuvering by weds.But it's really not if you just added 10mill a yr rb in David Johnson and know that Amari is asking for 20mill. You gained what... 2 mill from Hopkin's current salary for the year? Smh...
Perhaps, but trying to replace the best WR in football with a draft pick is a fool’s errand, IMO. Besides, getting that RB, with that contract for that best-in-the-world WR is an exceptionally low value proposition.another poster mentioned a good point. Could it be more about the wr draft class than it was anything else?
yup. My guess is they will turn that pick into a wr.
UNLESS they have a free agent wr target in mind. Cooper?Perhaps, but trying to replace the best WR in football with a draft pick is a fool’s errand, IMO. Besides, getting that RB, with that contract for that best-in-the-world WR is an exceptionally low value proposition.
Who knows? It certainly looks foolish from the outside.
Maybe so...I'm just throwing it out there.A lesser receiver than what they had.
worse trade of all time by the Texans. Wow.
Agreed... still doesn't make sense and is a really bone-headed traded which is par for the course with this BoB guy it seems. Boys need to take advantage. How about Watson for Dak and we'll throw in Witten? I know.. that boat has sailed but I can dream.its Monday. Lets see if they do other maneuvering by weds.
Maybe so...I'm just throwing it out there.
Hopkins will get a new deal and we'll give Amari the same money.
Amari wanted the market to set before signing. Now it will.
UNLESS they have a free agent wr target in mind. Cooper?
That still doesn’t justify that trade. Not in the slightest. I don’t care if they sign 4 WR’s in FA... that still doesn’t change the trade parameters and the fact that the value is skewed heavily in Arizona’s favor, and that it doesn’t really help Houston’s cap situation.UNLESS they have a free agent wr target in mind. Cooper?
we cannot change a thing. Its done.That still doesn’t justify that trade. Not in the slightest. I don’t care if they sign 4 WR’s in FA... that still doesn’t change the trade parameters and the fact that the value is skewed heavily in Arizona’s favor, and that it doesn’t really help Houston’s cap situation.
Hopkins and a free agent RB would cost way, way less than Johnson and Cooper. And looking at talent without worrying about the salary cap... I’d take Hopkins and a FA RB over Cooper/Johnson any day.
Perhaps, but trying to replace the best WR in football with a draft pick is a fool’s errand, IMO. Besides, getting that RB, with that contract for that best-in-the-world WR is an exceptionally low value proposition.
Who knows? It certainly looks foolish from the outside.
That still doesn’t justify that trade. Not in the slightest. I don’t care if they sign 4 WR’s in FA... that still doesn’t change the trade parameters and the fact that the value is skewed heavily in Arizona’s favor, and that it doesn’t really help Houston’s cap situation.
Hopkins and a free agent RB would cost way, way less than Johnson and Cooper. And looking at talent without worrying about the salary cap... I’d take Hopkins and a FA RB over Cooper/Johnson any day.
Well, I wasn’t arguing that the trade needed to be undone, and I really don’t care what Houston does... but the trade doesn’t make much sense.we cannot change a thing. Its done.