Crawford needs to restructure

[charron]

It's a myth that anybody said 'they won't'.

OK Jerry said he'd be here and Stephen said they will look at several restructures. Nothing specific.

 

[Stash]

I know you don't value yourself, so I suppose you would play for free!! Sthu!!!

How does that make any of this right?

Oh, that's right, or doesn't.

Stick to what you're good at.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Lawrence
McCoy
Poe
Gregory
Aldon
Gallimore
Woods
Anae
Armstrong

That’s already 9 linemen who are 100% making the team. (I suppose Armstrong isn’t 100%, but the team loves him). That doesn’t include Crawford, Jelks or Jackson. If we add Griffin? That’s already 10. We don’t need Crawford. Griffin is a major upgrade and we can have him for about the same money as we’d save by cutting Crawford.

Cowboys are not cutting Crawford in favor of inferior players.

 

[Ranching]

How does that make any of this right?

Oh, that's right, or doesn't.

Stick to what you're good at.

I'm good at football. You're good at throwing crap on the wall and see if it sticks.

 

[Stash]

I'm good at football. You're good at throwing crap on the wall and see if it sticks.

Sure thing. The next time you show that will be the first.

Sound argument and debate just isn't your thing.

 

[Stash]

Cowboys are not cutting Crawford in favor of inferior players.

Who exactly would those 'inferior players' be?

And who costs anywhere near the cost?

 

[Sydla]

LOL.

All the board experts keep saying it's OK to keep Crawford as he will restructure................ and yet the restructure never comes.

 

[Ranching]

Sure thing. The next time you show that will be the first.

Sound argument and debate just isn't your thing.

Again. Sthu.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Lawrence
McCoy
Poe
Gregory
Aldon
Gallimore
Woods
Anae
Armstrong

That’s already 9 linemen who are 100% making the team. (I suppose Armstrong isn’t 100%, but the team loves him). That doesn’t include Crawford, Jelks or Jackson. If we add Griffin? That’s already 10. We don’t need Crawford. Griffin is a major upgrade and we can have him for about the same money as we’d save by cutting Crawford.

Woods is not under contract.

 

[Stash]

Again. Sthu.

How about no?

 

[Ranching]

Sure thing. The next time you show that will be the first.

Sound argument and debate just isn't your thing.

I don't have to justify myself to a used car salesman. Lol.... Go on with your bad self! Lol!!!!

 

[Ranching]

How about no?

Go ahead! Talk!!!!

 

[Stash]

LOL.

All the board experts keep saying it's OK to keep Crawford as he will restructure................ and yet the restructure never comes.

Now the dummies are trying to say that it's OK, and his contract 'isn't that bad'.

Some people feel the need to tell themselves any lie in order to feel better about things.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Who exactly would those 'inferior players' be?

And who costs anywhere near the cost?

They don’t care about the cost. I assume they don’t anyway since he’s been overpaid for years. And these late round guys right now are inferior to him. If they go into camp and outplay him I expect him to be cut. But just getting cut for the sake of it? Not seeing it. If it comes down to him getting cut or Armstrong I’d hope they cut him.

 

[Stash]

I don't have to justify myself to a used car salesman. Lol.... Go on with your bad self! Lol!!!!

No, by all means keep saying dumb things and showing me and everyone else you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[Ranching]

How about no?

Keep posting crap....we can't wait to hear great insight....you are the next Mel Kiper! Lol!!!!

 

[Sydla]

Cowboys are not cutting Crawford in favor of inferior players.

I wouldn't cut him for an inferior player.

I'd cut him so I can sign Everson Griffen, who is a better player and fills a glaring need.

 

[Ranching]

No, by all means keep saying dumb things and showing me and everyone else you don't know what you're talking about.

The only thing I know is that you are a like hog and don't know anything about football except what you read on the internet. Have you ever worn a uniform????

 

[Stash]

They don’t care about the cost. I assume they don’t anyway since he’s been overpaid for years.

And yiu and I both know that they've been wrong here for years. Just because they do something doesn't make it smart.

And these late round guys right now are inferior to him. If they go into camp and outplay him I expect him to be cut.

Which 'guys' are you referring to?

But just getting cut for the sake of it? Not seeing it. If it comes down to him getting cut or Armstrong I’d hope they cut him.

Cutting him for the COST of it.

After the draft, we're already talking about taking 13 defensive linemen to camp. More than enough to replace this one.

 

[Stash]

The only thing I know is that you are a like hog and don't know anything about football except what you read on the internet. Have you ever worn a uniform????

Sure I have, does that mean my opinions matter now?