mullet
Active Member
- Messages
- 872
- Reaction score
- 48
Yikes.
and your Front Office told you it would be fine.
"You don't really need a #1 WR"
Amazing we went 10-6 that year with those kind of receivers. Those receivers weren't just bad, they're TERRIBLE. Below an average college football team.
We would've easily gone 13-3 if we started with better receivers. And the offensive line doesn't give up 59 sacks for the year. We gave up 7 sacks against New Orleans and Dak still won the game.
We would've gotten those games against Seattle, Houston, and Washington back, and probably would've beaten Carolina too.
Someone has forgotten our star wr, Terence Williams. Awww....memories. I still remember that one toe-tapping catch when he had to reach high, and he actually used his hands!
So they died by the sword.And that same front office traded for Cooper drafted Gallup and Lamb sooooooo! Lol
Beasley used to murder that slot. Was my pet cat too as an UDFA.
The FO did a fantastic job revamping and improving our WR corps. It's popular to clown on JJ and the boys, but the last few years we've been ran very well. Of course I'd have preferred a coaching change sooner, however from a team building standpoint its hard to argue with our talent.
Nope, need 3 of thm.and your Front Office told you it would be fine.
"You don't really need a #1 WR"
What a genius idea by the coaching staff. Go into the season with a 2nd year QB with Cole Beasley as your best WR.
Yep. We should only give them credit when they do something good. Even if it was a correction of something they were obviously dead wrong about.And that same front office traded for Cooper drafted Gallup and Lamb sooooooo! Lol
Except it was Stephen who said it.The great Garrett. LOL
Well, we absolutely have 3 of them now.Nope, need 3 of thm.
I give them credit for digging the hole in the first place.