Risen Star
Likes Collector
- Messages
- 87,286
- Reaction score
- 205,528
No. 2-10.
You could throw the Steelers in there too. We only lost that game by 5 points with Garrett Gilbert at QB.
7 - 5 ?????? Seriously, I don't think we would of been any better off if he was still playing. This is a real bad team that would of found a ways to lose games with Dak in the back field. Hell, we had NO business winning that Atlanta game but we did so the way I see it Dak was 1-4 when he went down. So how are you getting to 7-5???????????????????????????????????????????????????????...nope, I honestly think Dak would have us at least 7-5. There were a few games the defense played well to win them. Of course with Dak at the helm. Dalton is just a leg worth all of Dak.
But I suppose whatever was not right with the team, would eventually get exposed.
..thoughts? ..
..Dak was putting up 35+pt games, augmented with 400+ yds. Carried the defense every game. Did you just watch the highlights?7 - 5 ?????? Seriously, I don't think we would of been any better off if he was still playing. This is a real bad team that would of found a ways to lose games with Dak in the back field. Hell, we had NO business winning that Atlanta game but we did so the way I see it Dak was 1-4 when he went down. So how are you getting to 7-5???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
He was a journeyman. Being unknown doesn't make a guy who had never gotten an NFL start in the 6 years he has been out of college a good QB. And realistically, the reason the Cowboys stayed close wasn't because the offense was stellar with Gilbert, it was because the defense had a surprisingly strong game. The offense likely would have scored more than 19 points with Dak at QB.Wasn't Gilbert kind of an unknown quantity for them though? I don't think Dak would have won that game.
i didnt count the rams game.
i just stated it should've been a win if not for a bogus call.
You could throw the Steelers in there too. We only lost that game by 5 points with Garrett Gilbert at QB.
..Dak was putting up 35+pt games, augmented with 400+ yds. Carried the defense every game. Did you just watch the highlights?
So, Atlanta gets credit for the win despite the fact they lost, and despite the Cowboys handing them first half points after turnovers, and despite screwing up the onside kick? That's nonsense. If Dallas loses because they screw up, that means they didn't do what they needed to win and the other team did. Why would the same applies in reverse? Also, every other team gets credit for wins even when they were helped by mistakes by their opponents, so why wouldn't Dallas?7 - 5 ?????? Seriously, I don't think we would of been any better off if he was still playing. This is a real bad team that would of found a ways to lose games with Dak in the back field. Hell, we had NO business winning that Atlanta game but we did so the way I see it Dak was 1-4 when he went down. So how are you getting to 7-5???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Maybe, and frankly we don't know how any game would have played out if Dak were in it. There are some that had Dak played and we sustained drives or put up points the defense might have been more rested. Ultimately we are guessing at all of it.I think the Steelers were playing down to the competition. They are a much better team now.
Some are giving Dalton credit for the Giants win even though he only led drives that resulted in 6 of the Cowboys 37 points.2-3 - if you're going to troll at least be accurate..
...nope, I honestly think Dak would have us at least 7-5. There were a few games the defense played well to win them. Of course with Dak at the helm. Dalton is just a leg worth all of Dak.
But I suppose whatever was not right with the team, would eventually get exposed.
..thoughts? ..
We were 1-3 with him so I would think we would be around 5-7 or so. This is not a good team and Dak can't do anything about the awful defense.