Remember Ruggs last year?

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
What the heck does Pitts have to do w Ruggs? They're nothing alike. What a weird thread.

Hey guys..remember Dinucci last year? He sucked..

If I'm the jags, I'm worried about Lawrence

Are you really that confused? Pitts is THIS years Ruggs for many. The offensive stud that is supposed to represent the BPA to be taken over defense.
 

visionary

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,658
Reaction score
32,109
And in swoops the depressed troll to try and turn this into a Dak hate thread. :espn:

You lost buddy, get over it.

This from the guy who think Riggs = Pitts

might be a good idea to actually learn some football

:facepalm:
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
This from the guy who think Riggs = Pitts

might be a good idea to actually learn some football

:facepalm:

I guess you missed this line?

Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.

Poor little troll. Always having to lie and deceive.

And lets not forget you were the genius that said Dak was backup material. :lmao::lmao::lmao2:
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,574
Reaction score
12,282
All the BPA guys were clamoring for Ruggs if he was there. "We have to take him"!!!!

What a huge mistake THAT would have been?

Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.

Literally no one on this board was pushing for Ruggs over Lamb.

Stop starting threads based entirely on your misunderstandings and various agenda.
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
Literally no one on this board was pushing for Ruggs over Lamb.

Stop starting threads based entirely on your misunderstandings and various agenda.

Ruggs over Lamb? You must be talking about someone else troll. Try to keep up with the conversation.
 

Loso86

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,651
Reaction score
3,841
Similar, but not the same. Lamb was widely considered the #1 WR. So it was highly unlikely he would drop. Most thought Ruggs might drop as the #3 best WR in the draft and still wanted him as BPA.
I don't remember that at all. But that's the point the BPA was there
 

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,630
Reaction score
62,864
I guess you missed this line?

Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.

Poor little troll. Always having to lie and deceive.

And lets not forget you were the genius that said Dak was backup material. :lmao::lmao::lmao2:
Damn.
 

Loso86

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,651
Reaction score
3,841
yet if that bpa was Ruggs it would have flopped.
Well it wasn't it was Lamb and were better off now than if we would've taken for need and took Chaisson like most wanted. Or if not him we would've probably taken diggs which we got him in the 2nd so idk man
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,574
Reaction score
12,282
Ruggs over Lamb? You must be talking about someone else troll. Try to keep up with the conversation.

Typical Ron.

Changing the subject after he pollutes the board with yet another crap post
 

Seven

Messenger to the football Gods
Messages
19,293
Reaction score
9,878
And in swoops the depressed troll to try and turn this into a Dak hate thread. :espn:

You lost buddy, get over it.
......and his username is "Visionary".

Should be "Sheep".
 

ChuckA1

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,232
Reaction score
6,908
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
OP got this one confused if he's suggesting any similarities between Ruggs and Pitts, EXCEPT maybe their names both end in 's'. That's about it.
 
Top