Remember Ruggs last year?

JBS said:
What the heck does Pitts have to do w Ruggs? They're nothing alike. What a weird thread.

Hey guys..remember Dinucci last year? He sucked..

If I'm the jags, I'm worried about Lawrence
Click to expand...

Are you really that confused? Pitts is THIS years Ruggs for many. The offensive stud that is supposed to represent the BPA to be taken over defense.
 
CowboyRoy said:
And in swoops the depressed troll to try and turn this into a Dak hate thread. :espn:

You lost buddy, get over it.
Click to expand...

This from the guy who think Riggs = Pitts

might be a good idea to actually learn some football

:facepalm:
 
visionary said:
This from the guy who think Riggs = Pitts

might be a good idea to actually learn some football

:facepalm:
Click to expand...

I guess you missed this line?

Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.

Poor little troll. Always having to lie and deceive.

And lets not forget you were the genius that said Dak was backup material. :lmao::lmao::lmao2:
 
CowboyRoy said:
All the BPA guys were clamoring for Ruggs if he was there. "We have to take him"!!!!

What a huge mistake THAT would have been?

Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.
Click to expand...

Literally no one on this board was pushing for Ruggs over Lamb.

Stop starting threads based entirely on your misunderstandings and various agenda.
 
AbeBeta said:
Literally no one on this board was pushing for Ruggs over Lamb.

Stop starting threads based entirely on your misunderstandings and various agenda.
Click to expand...

Ruggs over Lamb? You must be talking about someone else troll. Try to keep up with the conversation.
 
CowboyRoy said:
Similar, but not the same. Lamb was widely considered the #1 WR. So it was highly unlikely he would drop. Most thought Ruggs might drop as the #3 best WR in the draft and still wanted him as BPA.
Click to expand...
I don't remember that at all. But that's the point the BPA was there
 
CowboyRoy said:
I guess you missed this line?

Although I freely admit that Pitts is a much better prospect overall than Ruggs was.

Poor little troll. Always having to lie and deceive.

And lets not forget you were the genius that said Dak was backup material. :lmao::lmao::lmao2:
Click to expand...
Damn.
 
CowboyRoy said:
yet if that bpa was Ruggs it would have flopped.
Click to expand...
Well it wasn't it was Lamb and were better off now than if we would've taken for need and took Chaisson like most wanted. Or if not him we would've probably taken diggs which we got him in the 2nd so idk man
 
CowboyRoy said:
Ruggs over Lamb? You must be talking about someone else troll. Try to keep up with the conversation.
Click to expand...

Typical Ron.

Changing the subject after he pollutes the board with yet another crap post
 
CowboyRoy said:
And in swoops the depressed troll to try and turn this into a Dak hate thread. :espn:

You lost buddy, get over it.
Click to expand...
......and his username is "Visionary".

Should be "Sheep".
 
OP got this one confused if he's suggesting any similarities between Ruggs and Pitts, EXCEPT maybe their names both end in 's'. That's about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 22,520 (members: 31, guests: 22,489)
Robots: 952

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,265
Messages
14,526,426
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top