He was talking earlier on The Fan today. This may be just conjecture on his part, so take it for what it’s worth, but he says that he thinks the Cowboys “final four” that they may realistically have a chance of drafting would be listed in this order:
1. Sewell
2. Slater
3. Surtain
4. Horn
He suggests that if any of these guys are there (or all of them for that matter) that if we pick at #10 that we would take one of them IN THAT ORDER.
He suggested that the Cowboys believe that Pitts will be long gone before the Cowboys pick.
I think the Cowboys would take Sewell over the other 3 but my gut feeling is they would take Surtain over Slater.
Slater over Surtain is a fail
Pitts? Give me them the most needed position, Surtain!
Slater over Surtain is a fail
Grab Surtain at #10 pair him with Diggs and let's get some interceptions![]()
at the level of talent at that #10 spot, Slater or Sewell there you pick, otherwise trade down and go defenseThat's interesting. Nothing has to happen for our pass defense to be crap, it already is
Collins I fearIn other words. We drafting Parsons.
I think any average schmoe could guess those players.He was talking earlier on The Fan today. This may be just conjecture on his part, so take it for what it’s worth, but he says that he thinks the Cowboys “final four” that they may realistically have a chance of drafting would be listed in this order:
1. Sewell
2. Slater
3. Surtain
4. Horn
He suggests that if any of these guys are there (or all of them for that matter) that if we pick at #10 that we would take one of them IN THAT ORDER.
He suggested that the Cowboys believe that Pitts will be long gone before the Cowboys pick.
Surtain > Slaterat the level of talent at that #10 spot, Slater or Sewell there you pick, otherwise trade down and go defense
He was talking earlier on The Fan today. This may be just conjecture on his part, so take it for what it’s worth, but he says that he thinks the Cowboys “final four” that they may realistically have a chance of drafting would be listed in this order:
1. Sewell
2. Slater
3. Surtain
4. Horn
He suggests that if any of these guys are there (or all of them for that matter) that if we pick at #10 that we would take one of them IN THAT ORDER.
He suggested that the Cowboys believe that Pitts will be long gone before the Cowboys pick.
Neither one of them would be a bad pick. Out LB corps sucksCollins I fear
Cowboys rank players but doesn't mean they will always follow that board. I can't imagine Slater being the pick over Surtain or Horn unless there's legit concern over Collins. Sewell in the unliklihood he falls I can see why they would rank him first and may take him.
I'm wondering if the Cowboys believe they're better at CB on the front end of the roster than the rest of the fan base thinks? Diggs, Lewis, and Brown are better than their performance last year, but they should be looking to upgrade.
What do you get when you mix a Cowturd, a Fish, a SAS and a Skip Clueless? @HowardCYeah he had a video on this yesterday on his youtube channel.
If you pay he'll give you the short list for the rest of the rounds.
