News: ESPN Analyst Has Blunt Message For Dak Prescott, Cowboys

MountaineerCowboy said:
Why not Super Bowl related? Why should anything else but the ultimate goal matter? See, this is where I have a heard time with certain fans. At some point fans like yourself stopped expecting championships and became satisfied as long as your favorite players has nice stats.

That's why you use this "Marino vs Dilfer" thing. Because you are obsessed with the fact that Marino has all this skill and pretty numbers, while Dilfer doesn't have all that skill or the pretty numbers. Dilfer has what should matter though (kiss the ring), and does matter to most fans, excluding yourself of course.
Click to expand...
answer the question...that simple....

to be clear: the ultimate goal of everyone is championship. that's why they play the games.....I expect championship every season.

nice try to spin your way out of answering...
 
CowboysFaninHouston said:
answer the question...that simple....

to be clear: the ultimate goal of everyone is championship. that's why they play the games.....I expect championship every season.

nice try to spin your way out of answering...
Click to expand...
The ultimate goal is that Super Bowl ring then.....

Dilfer- Winner
Marino- Loser

There is literally no disputing that.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
Yeah, he has. He's said it many times, actually. I watched him do an interview where he said he wished he'd have listened to Shula/Johnson a little more, in terms of running game etc. Said he probably cost himself a championship and he regretted that.
Click to expand...
I didn’t ask you the question. LOL but I appreciate your response But you have to understand this also. Yeah I regret it. But I’m not upset about it. I knew someone who missed getting a second ring. They regret it also. But I’m not gonna be upset about it. An actual quote.
 
Last edited:
MountaineerCowboy said:
I don't care about how you frame your questions.

I will answer them the way I see fit. If you don't like it then stop asking me questions.
Click to expand...
avoiding....answer the question...you asked me similar question and I answered you. now you are avoiding to answer like the plague...what are you afraid of?

and this is very typical of you. get cornered. immediately make up my own rules. say its my rules. and there you are all by yourself, making rules for yourself, so you can answer to yourself, justifying it to yourself....
its a one man show at this point

dully noted. he avoids answering tough questions

done
 
CowboysFaninHouston said:
avoiding....answer the question...you asked me similar question and I answered you. now you are avoiding to answer like the plague...what are you afraid of?

and this is very typical of you. get cornered. immediately make up my own rules. say its my rules. and there you are all by yourself, making rules for yourself, so you can answer to yourself, justifying it to yourself....
its a one man show at this point

dully noted. he avoids answering tough questions

done
Click to expand...
It's always a one man show when debating anything with you. You're easy.
 
Whirlwin said:
I prefer Marino lost. Not loser.
Click to expand...
see, a smart person in the room after all.

I asked him the same thing. its easy to thump your chest after the fact. so if you had a choice to add a QB to your team, both Dilfer and Marino in their prime who would you choose? he never answered...he tried to spin and said, I preferred Dilfer's career over Marino....but that wasn't the question I had asked...he tries. you have to give him credit and a participation trophy for that.
 
Ranching said:
Doesn't surprise me that you would post and support this. It's all Dak's fault.......ok.
Click to expand...

So when you Dak homers post articles that are pro Dak you chime in and prostate yourself to the Cult of Dak. You have no problem with that. But post an article with some historical facts your panties get in a bunch. And for the record, Punk, I never blamed Dak in my post, I just wrote the stats. And I said the team had a ways to go. Hopefully when you get older you won’t be so threatened by facts and attack messengers.
 
CowboysFaninHouston said:
see, a smart person in the room after all.

I asked him the same thing. its easy to thump your chest after the fact. so if you had a choice to add a QB to your team, both Dilfer and Marino in their prime who would you choose? he never answered...he tried to spin and said, I preferred Dilfer's career over Marino....but that wasn't the question I had asked...he tries. you have to give him credit and a participation trophy for that.
Click to expand...
I don’t know what his agenda is. I just know he doesn’t appreciate Prescott too much.
 
MaineBoy said:
So when you Dak homers post articles that are pro Dak you chime in and prostate yourself to the Cult of Dak. You have no problem with that. But post an article with some historical facts your panties get in a bunch. And for the record, Punk, I never blamed Dak in my post, I just wrote the stats. And I said the team had a ways to go. Hopefully when you get older you won’t be so threatened by facts and attack messengers.
Click to expand...
An opinion piece that shows Dak as a top 10 QB on some random dudes list is applauding and took as the gospel.

A piece that shows literally facts and numbers to back things up is cursed to the moon.

It's pretty funny isn't it?
 
MaineBoy said:
So when you Dak homers post articles that are pro Dak you chime in and prostate yourself to the Cult of Dak. You have no problem with that. But post an article with some historical facts your panties get in a bunch. And for the record, Punk, I never blamed Dak in my post, I just wrote the stats. And I said the team had a ways to go. Hopefully when you get older you won’t be so threatened by facts and attack messengers.
Click to expand...
First of all. Calling people a homer is the wrong choice . Just because we support one player does it mean we can’t still critique that player. There’s a difference. And what you posted was not a fact, it was opinion . . I think that’s not a mistake you made
 
MountaineerCowboy said:
An opinion piece that shows Dak as a top 10 QB on some random dudes list is applauding and took as the gospel.

A piece that shows literally facts and numbers to back things up is cursed to the moon.

It's pretty funny isn't it?
Click to expand...
The point is the word opinion. And this guy is saying it’s fact. That’s what’s Upsetting. At least you know the difference. . Or do you.? You call one sentence an opinion in the next a fact.
 
Whirlwin said:
First of all. Calling people a homer is the wrong choice . Just because we support one player does it mean we can’t still critique that player. There’s a difference. And what you posted was not a fact, it was opinion . . I think that’s not a mistake you made
Click to expand...

I think my only opinion was that this team had a long way to go ? My other sentence stated the stats from the article. Concluding with popcorn for spectating. And I was using the term homers to describe the people who attack anyone posting anything non positive about Dak or this franchise. People who champion Dak without attacking others who see Dak differently are fans not homers. Thanks for pointing it out so I could explain what I mean by homers.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

Total: 1,506 (members: 35, guests: 1,471)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,316
Messages
13,865,590
Members
23,790
Latest member
MisterWaffles
Back
Top