A common complaint about Dak is he is horrible in the redzone

[Qcard]

Dak is the BEST QB in the Red Zone.....!!!!!

P.S. I am of course a field goal kicker......

 

[Rockport]

I have watched him play with hope filled eyes numerous times. The contract has erased the hope. He now must take this team to post season wins. You think he has haters now? Just let his current level of play continue without post season success. He can't have 200 yard games in big moments anymore. Can't have 0 td's in big moments. Can't miss that key throw on 3rd down. Can't almost come back and win the game. His contact says I am one of the best in the game. So let's see it. My popcorn has been popped and been waiting on it.

The perception, started by the haters, that he doesn’t show up in big games is just that, perception. Believe what you will.

 

[Rockport]

I tore your stat to shreds in a previous post in this thread. You failed to answer. I even applied your metric, Number of TDs, to red zone rushing for QBs. Nothing but crickets from you.

The stat you want to look at is team red zone TD efficiency. I gave you the link to it.

You didn’t tear anything to shreds other than your reputation. Oh yeah, 42-27

 

[USArmyVet]

The perception, started by the haters, that he doesn’t show up in big games is just that, perception. Believe what you will.

There are numerous examples when he failed to show up actually (ex. Saints, Patriots, Eagles a few times, etc.) so not sure how you can say it's just perception.

 

[TwoCentPlain]

You didn’t tear anything to shreds other than your reputation. Oh yeah, 42-27

I said nothing about 42-27 in this thread. Your topic was red zone TDs by QBs. It is a good topic and thread you started. QB Red zone TDs don’t tell the story correctly. Team red zone TD efficiency tells a much better story. Go look at that data.

You are using the wrong metric to measure the QB in the red zone.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

There are numerous examples when he failed to show up actually (ex. Saints, Patriots, Eagles a few times, etc.) so not sure how you can say it's just perception.

10 pts vs the Saints.
9 Pts vs the Pats.
9 Pts vs a depleted Eagles team for the division title.
Common now don't you see the greatness???
HATER!!!!
HATER!!!!

 

[Rockport]

So your goal is to attempt to antagonize members? I could have sworn that was a rule violation so thanks for admitting that you are purposely setting out to break the rules.

All you do is cry and try to antagonize me.

 

[Rockport]

I just post the stats, Rockport. I don't care one single bit if you like em or not.

42-27

 

[PAPPYDOG]

All you do is cry and try to antagonize me.

I'm here for you Rockport thru all your madness of hate and insults!!

 

[kskboys]

We should start a section where only Rocky and Papsmear are allowed and just let them go at each other, but not allowed anywhere else. Sure would make the boards a better place.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

42-27

I'll be sure to keep this in mind the next time I see you claiming wins/losses aren't a QB stat.

That record since we had Dak started out great, but it's inching closer and closer to .500.

 

[PAPPYDOG]

We should start a section where only Rocky and Papsmear are allowed and just let them go at each other, but not allowed anywhere else. Sure would make the boards a better place.

Call your buddy Diehardblues and start your own Cowboy chat site......
Trust me it will be a very lonely place to be........kskgirl

 

[Rockport]

I'll be sure to keep this in mind the next time I see you claiming wins/losses aren't a QB stat.

That record since we had Dak started out great, but it's inching closer and closer to .500.

And you’ll be rooting for the team to lose to further your hate filled agenda.

 

[MountaineerCowboy]

And you’ll be rooting for the team to lose to further your hate filled agenda.

That's the old go to line you use to try and justify calling Dallas Cowboys fans "hater" because they aren't completely sold on a player the way you are.

Your insults are weak, old, and stale. I've only been here since February, so I can only imagine how the poor souls that have had to endure your out dated material for years over and over now must feel.

 

[kskboys]

Call your buddy Diehardblues and start your own Cowboy chat site......
Trust me it will be a very lonely place to be........kskgirl

Hey, why don't you call your buddies.....never mind!!!!!!

 

[TwoCentPlain]

We should start a section where only Rocky and Papsmear are allowed and just let them go at each other, but not allowed anywhere else. Sure would make the boards a better place.

Hey, I want a piece of that action. I am one of the top ten haters. Give this hater (me) some love.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I've been away for awhile and the answer is clearly no. It's kind of sad.

That's wild to me the stuff people on here do for attention....part of me hopes its all just one person on burner accounts......but then that would probably be even more sad.....

 

[Gaede]

New goalpoat?

You seriously don't understand the concept that the smaller the area to defend becomes, the more difficult it is to exploit that defense? You don't understand that when the field shrinks, so do the windows, requiring greater accuracy?

You seriously don't understand that when in an already short field, the inability to attack every part of that short field is a major advantage to the defense?

I mean, come on man, that is basic, 101 stuff.

Are you the one who is going to be able to show me the plays that proves this wrong? So far nobody has been able to do it. Are you up to it?

Although improved, Dak's accuracy is not good in these congested areas (which only occur down near the goal line, hence "inside the 10"). The middle of the endzone is rarely attacked because of this. Defenses key on Zeke, and cover the fades. Moore is handcuffed, and has resorted to coming up with those trick plays we see him call down there. It is blatantly obvious.

Prove me wrong.

Yeah, it is a new goalpost. Every year, there is some random obscure BS you guys pull out of your *** like it's some sort of Achilles heel, or gotcha moment in which you've successfully proved that Dak isn't actually a good QB despite all of the evidence to the contrary.

And then when Dak proves your little theories are wrong, you find a new random item that actually doesn't mean anything significant when you take into account the entire player.

 

[TwoCentPlain]

Hey, why don't you call your buddies.....never mind!!!!!!

@PAPPYDOG I’m with you Pappy. It’s 100 of them and only 10 of us. That is not fair. They need to get more people.

 

[TwoCentPlain]

Yeah, it is a new goalpost. Every year, there is some random obscure BS you guys pull out of your *** like it's some sort of Achilles heel, or gotcha moment in which you've successfully proved that Dak isn't actually a good QB despite all of the evidence to the contrary.

And then when Dak proves your little theories are wrong, you find a new random item that actually doesn't mean anything significant when you take into account the entire player.

Many times it is the Cult of Dak putting forward some stat claiming greatness and others saying not so fast.

Just like this thread started with some flimsy stat (Number of QB red zone TDs) and I shredded it apart. It is about team red zone TD efficiency.

@MountaineerCowboy shredded their stats many times.