CowboyFrog
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,137
- Reaction score
- 10,115
Welp, there you go. Out in the open. Provide you with documented proof you asked for and now you tap dance to avoid doing what you say. Asked you 3 separate times even after rehashing what you stated you needed to see as the goal posts moved.
@Crazed Liotta Eyes, this is what I meant and rail against whenever I get the chance. If they aren't outright lying, they're debating in bad faith even in the face of proof. Call it a crusade, but it's the one I've chosen. Lol.
Thats crap but call it whatever you want ...man either you have a shot of him being touched with his knee down or you dont...wich one is it? again you described you in this post not me...this whole time we have argued what the refs should've called and what they could see...you said they saw his knee down I said but not while someone was clearly touching him you then show me an angle of a guy jumping over the pile touching him but not while his knee was down because you cant see his knee in that angle..I said it would be diferent if you could show me a player hitting him from the front and pushing him back....you sir are spinning and trying to claim "this is what I meant" ...BS...again the only logical call they could've made is off the unpile...period.