Dak could not have done what Rodgers just did

[5Stars]

Because it's pointless to argue with ignorance? His entire post is garbage. There's zero sense in debating that.

Then just move on, don't read it. But, sometimes it's just fun reading nonsense, it brings me back to reality. lol

 

[morat1959]

Comparing Dak to Rodgers and Brady is Ludicrous!
A glorified massively overpaid "Bus Driver"...enough said!

Nailed it!

 

[Aulac]

Yet Rodgers only Super Bowl win is still with McCarthy. So what will your excuse for Rodgers be if the Packers don't win a Super Bowl this year, since he is so great and elite. He should be able to win it all once he has all of his WRs back. How many times has Rodgers failed in the playoffs or failed to get back to the Super Bowl?

He won't, Robert Tonyan is out for the rest of the year. I mean Brady had 3 picks in the NFCCG and his team still won.

 

[morat1959]

Dak will never put a team on his back and carry them anywhere. Dak does not make players around him better.

 

[Aulac]

And folks wonder why they are called Dak haters, look no further than the BS in the OP.

The hypocrisy with this post is ludicrous and you haters should be ashamed to even make a comment like that.

Y'all couldn't stand Dak his rookie year and he played better than Rodgers did Thursday. Guess throwing under 200 yards and red zone troubles only count against Dak. Guess winning those games only count against Dak.

Get a new song and dance, it's really played out. Nobody can take you guys serious with these idiotic takes

I mean just because its the truth doesnt mean you have to post it.

 

[JJHLH1]

NFL.com has Dak ranked number 1.

What do they know about QB’s.

Anybody who claims Dak isn’t a top-5 QB hasn’t been watching.

https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-qb-index-week-8-2021-season-rankings

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

He won't, Robert Tonyan is out for the rest of the year. I mean Brady had 3 picks in the NFCCG and his team still won.

Nope, no excuses for Rodgers. You made this thread claiming he can do what Dak can't do and is so elite, meaning that even without Tonyan, he should be able to win the Super Bowl for as long as he has Davante Adam and Aaron Jones throughout the playoffs. And since Dak wouldn't get the excuse of having Jarwin or Schutlz out for the season, then Rodgers shouldn't be granted with that excuse either. If he is so great and so much better than he was without McCarthy, then he should eventually prove it and win a Super Bowl without McCarthy,

Rodgers should be able to win a Super Bowl as long as he has his top WR and RB in the playoffs. I mean if he is as great as you say he is.

 

[Aulac]

NFL.com has Dak ranked number 1.

What do they know about QB’s.

https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-qb-index-week-8-2021-season-rankings

Stat with no context does not matter. Cowboys have the best roster in the NFL.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

Stat with no context does not matter. Cowboys have the best roster in the NFL.

Moving the goal posts as you Dak haters always do,

 

[Aulac]

Nope, no excuses for Rodgers. You made this thread claiming he'll can do what Dak can't do and is so elite, meaning that even without Tonyan, he should be able to win the Super Bowl for as long as he has Davante Adam and Aaron Jones throughout the playoffs. And since Dak wouldn't get the excuse of having Jarwin or Schutlz out for the season, then Rodgers shouldn't be granted with that excuse either. If he is so great and so much better than he was without McCarthy, then he should eventually prove it and win a Super Bowl without McCarthy,

Rodgers should be able to win a Super Bowl as long as he has his top WR and RB in the playoffs. I mean if he is as great as you say he is.

I mean for a few games, sure, but not for an entire season. That just unrealisic when Mahomes had 2 star receivers, Brady has 4 star receivers, Stafford has a trio of good receivers, and etc... Rodgers it the most talented QB to ever lace them up, but he not Wayne Gretzky to the point he far and above every other QB in the league.

 

[Aulac]

Moving the goal posts as you Dak haters always do,

Actually no, I have always maintain the opinion that Stat don't matter without context. I done the same thing with other QBs on the NFL section of this site.

 

[5Stars]

I mean for a few games, sure, but not for an entire season. That just unrealisic when Mahomes had 2 star receivers, Brady has 4 star receivers, Stafford has a trio of good receivers, and etc... Rodgers it the most talented QB to ever lace them up, but he not Wayne Gretzky to the point he far and above every other QB in the league.

Hold up a sec, let me get Tom Brady on the line, maybe that will clear up your "context".

 

[lk8701]

I miss Tony Romo and I hate Dak because he replaced Romo.

Thanks for your honesty.

 

[Aulac]

Hold up a sec. let me get Tom Brady on the line.

Tom is the most accomplished, but Rodgers is the most talented. Not the same thing.

 

[Yobwocs]

Aulac's lifelong need to prove that Dak is in fact not elite. Good to know you spend your day well flooding this thread post by post.

 

[5Stars]

Tom is the most accomplished, but Rodgers is the most talented. Not the same thing.

Hold up, I said! The phone is still ringing...
(some peoples kids)...lmao.

Don't play semantics with me, it makes you sound more stupid by the minute.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

I mean for a few games, sure, but not for an entire season. That just unrealisic when Mahomes had 2 star receivers, Brady has 4 star receivers, Stafford has a trio of good receivers, and etc... Rodgers it the most talented QB to ever lace them up, but he not Wayne Gretzky to the point he far and above every other QB in the league.

So Rodgers deserves credit for what you say that he can only do in one or two regular season games (Because Dak haters have said that regular season performances don't matter in the end, if he can't get it done in the playoffs), but he can't do in the playoffs, if he would have most of his top WRs playing, along with having Aaron Jones playing. And that Rodgers can't get it done when it comes to winning the Super Bowl. And that Rodgers has yet to prove that he can win a Super Bowl without McCarthy. I think that it's only fair that we judge Rodgers in how many Super Bowl wins he will have in his career, since that he what so many have judged Dak or claimed that Dak wouldn't be able to do. Which is either win or get to a Super Bowl under certain circumstances.

Also it sounds like you are implying that Rodgers would need certain "perfect" conditions to happen, in order to win another Super Bowl or that he isn't good or elite enough to win one with the current team that he has. Even though the claim against Dak was always that he needed a "perfect team" in order to win. So I guess you are implying that Rodgers is incapable of winning another Super Bowl without a "perfect team."

Rodgers would still be known as having only won his one SB with McCarthy, for as much criticism that McCarthy has received. If Rodgers doesn't even win another one in his career.

 

[America's Cowboy]

Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.

What an ignorant and badly misinformed rant of a post! You Dak haters need to disappear. Seriously. The more you rant, the stupider you sound. You're not even worth replying with a rebuttal, disproving point by point, because it's clear you don't get it and never will get it since you outright hate Dak. Do everyone a favor and go follow another team and their website.

 

[nalam]

Arod is great for sure, but I think Dak would have done ok in a game where the ground game produced 155 rush yards, and drives of 4 plays for 0 yards produced a field goal, and 5 plays for 14 yards produced a td due to Arizona turnovers.

This, with that kind of success on ground and D playing well , ( Hot hot. Kyler M was held without TD and 2 Ints) it was not due to AR , green bay won. But AR didnt do anything to jeopardize.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

Thanks for your honesty.

Just like a Romo fan (who still holds resentment against Dak for replacing Romo) to ask how many playoff wins does Dak have, win Romo only has 2 playoff wins in the entire 10 years of his NFL career.