Dak could not have done what Rodgers just did

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
[

Who the heck do you think Dak is compared to the glory and history of the Star?
A bad pimple that will be remembered for fleecing Goofball Jerry and Son.....
FYI we were here before Dak and ya bud we will be here after Dak!

Folks here have a short memory and forgot that Dak would have left the Cowboys if he didn't get paid the amount he wanted. Like Dak isn't even a Cowboys fan growing up. Folks here act like Dak made the Cowboys or something and if you don't like one player, you aren't a REAL Cowboys fan.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,576
Reaction score
11,172
Even if Dak isn't Aaron Rodgers, who cares? He was never billed as Aaron Rodgers. Plenty of players aren't equal to others at their position over the history of football. Does that make them any worse?
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,716
Reaction score
31,126
Folks here have a short memory and forgot that Dak would have left the Cowboys if he didn't get paid the amount he wanted.
Folks here? As opposed to folks somewhere else? As if folks elsewhere don't forget Dak would have left the Cowboys? Would Dak have left the Cowboys or was Jerry never going to let Dak leave?

Like Dak isn't even a Cowboys fan growing up.
Where did you get that information? Dak has stated several times he grew up a Cowboys fan. Do you have proof otherwise?

Folks here act like Dak made the Cowboys or something and if you don't like one player, you aren't a REAL Cowboys fan.
I don't see anyone here acting like Dak made the Cowboys. That's just a nonsensical statement. "or something" WTH? Or what? There are many Cowboys players you can dislike and still be a Cowboys fan, including Dak Prescott. But you are not acting like the typical Cowboys fan.
 

Aulac

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
713
Folks here? As opposed to folks somewhere else? As if folks elsewhere don't forget Dak would have left the Cowboys? Would Dak have left the Cowboys or was Jerry never going to let Dak leave?

Where did you get that information? Dak has stated several times he grew up a Cowboys fan. Do you have proof otherwise?

I don't see anyone here acting like Dak made the Cowboys. That's just a nonsensical statement. "or something" WTH? Or what? There are many Cowboys players you can dislike and still be a Cowboys fan, including Dak Prescott. But you are not acting like the typical Cowboys fan.

Jerry didn't want to pay Dak his asking price. Jerry didn't want Dak to leave but that because Jerry lacked the conviction to get another QB. Paying 40 millions per year to a QB that has never led his team to the NFCCG is beyond stupid. At least Flacco won a SB, and Goff outplayed Brees in the NFCCG, what has Dak ever done to warrant that amount of money? Not to mention after Dak torned his ACL.

You can go back to my earliest comment if you want. I didn't turn on Dak until he complained about his salary. Like if he was paid what he was worth, I would not have a problem with him. He getting pay more this year than Brady in 3 years.

Regarding the Cowboys comment, Dak became a Cowboys fan because of his dad. Dak grew up a Peyton Manning fan and most likely would have been a Colts fan otherwise.

Here is the exact quote from Dak below:

Prescott: The Dallas Cowboys ... My dad's a huge Dallas Cowboys fan. So, I grew up really not - I would say not having a choice - but he gave us all choices because my other brothers weren't Cowboys fans. But just kind of rolled with my dad and it's all panned out.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
35,716
Reaction score
31,126
Jerry didn't want to pay Dak his asking price. Jerry didn't want Dak to leave but that because Jerry lacked the conviction to get another QB. Paying 40 millions per year to a QB that has never led his team to the NFCCG is beyond stupid. At least Flacco won a SB, and Goff outplayed Brees in the NFCCG, what has Dak ever done to warrant that amount of money? Not to mention after Dak torned his ACL.
How do you know Jerry didn't want to pay Dak's asking price? He never said that. Jerry wanted Dak, He just wasn't going to give Dak what he wanted without his due diligence which includes time. Jerry didn't lack conviction, he wanted Dak and he got Dak. It's only your amateur opinion it was stupid to pay Dak $40M/yr. What Dak is doing now is why he is worth that price tag.

You can go back to my earliest comment if you want. I didn't turn on Dak until he complained about his salary. Like if he was paid what he was worth, I would not have a problem with him. He getting pay more this year than Brady in 3 years.
It's not your money, what do you care how much he gets paid? It's not your job to put the Cowboys on budget.

Regarding the Cowboys comment, Dak became a Cowboys fan because of his dad. Dak grew up a Peyton Manning fan and most likely would have been a Colts fan otherwise.
Lots of young boys grow up rooting for the same team their dad roots for. There is nothing wrong with that. That's what I did as well. As a boy, I was an Earl Campbell fan but I still rooted for the Cowboys over the Oilers. I think you're just wrong about Dak.

Here is the exact quote from Dak below:

Prescott: The Dallas Cowboys ... My dad's a huge Dallas Cowboys fan. So, I grew up really not - I would say not having a choice - but he gave us all choices because my other brothers weren't Cowboys fans. But just kind of rolled with my dad and it's all panned out.
He says right there it was his choice to root for the Cowboys. IMO, psychoanalyzing Dak's words about this and concluding he didn't really want to be a Cowboys fan is just pathologically crazy.
 

StarChamber_33

Well-Known Member
Messages
660
Reaction score
549
Football in its truest form is the ultimate TEAM game.; All 3-phases (Offense, Defense & Spec. Teams). ** To ignore those factors and place ALL the CREDIT or BLAME on a QB is short sighted at best.
 

cowboyed

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,438
Reaction score
1,586
Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.

There are other factors to consider in that win against the Cardinals. How well coached the Packers team is including the turnover of players and coaches in comparative years. If you are going to comparatively judge Dak over one deservedly outstanding game by Rodgers against the Cards then you might as well conclude that a number of elite quarterbacks including Mahomes are regressing - especially against lesser elite teams like the Cards who you have put on your pedestal.

I bet Rodgers has struggled in games the Packers lost with less teammates out against a highly competitive team in his career so whose to say Dak and other quarterbacks can't have one of those Rodgers moments.

Hey Eli Manning is the greatest elite quarterback ever because he beat the Patriots and Tom Brady in the 2008 Super Bowl when they (the Patriots) had an entire season perfect winning games record!
 
Last edited:

Qcard

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,860
Reaction score
7,532
Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.

@Aulac at least you are a consistent Dak Hater. Your EYE TEST doesn’t Age Well …..see below. :lmao2:
:lmao2::lmao2::lmao2:Dak Haters are pathetic

https://cowboyszone.com/threads/if-...ll-be-extremely-upset-as-a-fan.469413/page-10

While I'm new, I seen countless Dak bash threads on here. I seen threads of folks rather having Jared Goff than Dak (not too long ago) to now Dak better than Andrew Luck and Trevor Lawrence*. Obviously lot of members here with different opinion but this is quite a wild take if I do say so myself.

Stats can say a lot of things and are often accurate but stats without context doesn't paint the whole picture. My eye test show me that Daks has not and probably will never be on Andrew Luck level and he sure isn't worth 40 millions per year either. Dak look awful when he doesn't have Zeke and he not winning game with a bad O-line the way Luck was able to consistency.
 

nightrain

Since 1971
Messages
14,543
Reaction score
24,403
I disagree with this, though I did believe it before this year.

Dak cold definitely put the Cowboys in a position to win vs. a vey good opponent with an undermanned unit. The big question is, can the guys stepping up to cover for the injured players on offense make the plays when given the opportunity..
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,752
Reaction score
18,017
Lots of post here compare Dak to Manning, Brady, and paint Dak as an MVP front-runner. I like to share a different perspective.

Rodgers missing his top 3 receivers, 3 O-line man including David Bakhtiari, and his defensive coordinator--went into Arizona and beat the hottest team in football. That game is the definition of a QB doing more with less. That is a true MVP caliber QB and that someone who should be pay 40 millions a year.

Is that Dak? Can Dak do what Rodgers just did? Has Dak ever won against the best team in the league while being significantly undermanned? If we didn't have Lamb, Cooper, Gallup, missing 3 O-lineman, no Dan Quinn, and a running game that not as good as Zeke/Pollard, would we have beaten the Cardinals in their home? Rodgers has only thrown one pick this year, while Dak threw a pick against the lowly Giants.

Dak does "enough" for this team to win games because our roster is stack. He has only beaten the worst team in the league (Lions, Falcons, Giants, Eagles), without a running game in his entire career. He has not even beaten a single average team when the running game is absent.

Dak is not an MVP front-runner but he is in the conversation. Put any other top 10 QB on this team and they would do the same or better; Dalton is a backup, not a starter. Dak is not a top 5 QB but he is a fringe top 10 QB who look better thanks to the talent on this team and our division. I do think we have the #1 overall rosters with few flaw while having a decent amount of depth. Depth that team like the Rams, Cardinals, Bucs, Packers, and others don't have.
no one denies Rodgers is a better QB. that's been the discussion all summer too.

but I am glad you are comparing Dak to future HOF QB Rodgers ....that's an improvement on your part.

and great to see Rodgers throw for 184 yards...fantastic out put. :rolleyes:

p.s.
so Green not grabing a sure TD catch, because he forgot to look back is Rodgers playing great...:lmao:
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,752
Reaction score
18,017
I will Venmo you $1000 if you can show me where I called you a “non-Cowboys fan”.

A non-knowledgeable Cowboys fan? Easily. 100%! Without a shadow of a doubt.
I called him that....the truth hurts ...he is not a cowboys fan. its not because he doesn't support Dak,
if you would rather see cowboys lose so you can bash one player and gloat...then you are not a cowboys fan..
If you are going to pump other players from other teams, constantly bashing your own players, then you are not a cowboys fan
if you can't enjoy the wins and the success so far in the season and you find your agenda to be posting and gloating about somebody else then you are not a cowboys fan

you are a loser non-cowboy fan who has nothing left in life but to do this type of craap

@Aulac
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,752
Reaction score
18,017
The number of Dak's thread for Dak's homer is extremely lopsided. And Dak's homer do the same with their "like". Like don't be a hypocrite. Also no one in this thread has refuted what I posted...hmm I wonder why.
you mean people who support their team, not dak homer's...vs. non-cowboys fans......well, this is a cowboys forum what did you expect!!!

and how much do you want to bet that there are more Dak bashing thread by trolls such as yourself than there are thread supporting Dak.....

you ain't that bright are you?
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,752
Reaction score
18,017
Aaron shouldn't have been in that position in the first place. The Cardinals should have blown out the Packers. And Jones touchdown shouldn't have been reverse. With that said, FTP because the Packers get so many ref's call, but this game the ref actually tried to screw Green Bay, which kind of impress me. Is Kyler the NFL new golden boy?
:facepalm:

at this point you are posting drunk...this was an incomprehensible rambling
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
31,752
Reaction score
18,017
How about Murray choking the entire game? Cards should have blown out the Packers. Rodgers had no receiver this game. If he did, Packers would have blown out the Cards and Murray would be faking his injury by the end of the 3rd quarter. Oh he has a sprain ankle right? Boo Hoo!
this is the most hilarious post yet..
so you start by sticking your nose up Rodgers arse praising him...but then in this post you turn around and say it was Murray choking..

so was it Rodgers who played great and had you do all time admiration post with the brown all over your face
or was it Murray choking and cardinals should have blown packers away

because it can't be both...and this is were someone pulls you out of knee deep bullshiet you put out having dove head first

sorry, I really can't help stupid......I have tried but its not doable. impossible. there is levels of stupidity that can never be fixed.
 
Top