1. Amari was the FOURTH PICK of the 2015 draft, anc was already producing a thousand yards receiving two years out the gate in the dysfunctional franchise that was Oakland. He was ALREADY considered a top flight WR. There is no narrative change there.
2. Gruden traded him, like he traded Mack to build up assets for a franchise that was going through a complete overhaul. the Raiders were looking for a first round draft pick. There is no narrative change there.
3. Multiple teams called about Amari, but the Cowboys offered the most. There is no narrative there.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...i-cooper-considering-trade-oakland-raiders-wr
As stated, there is no narrative change there.
Amari, subjective feelings mean nothing as to these facts. especially when Amari himself stated he wasn’t happy in Oakland at that time and he wasn’t being used correctly in his first year with Gruden. I’m not even bothering listening to an interview which has nothing to do with the argument.