Ok. Let's do it again for a new audience.
One of our first interactions in the Dak/Romo debate on the old site was you saying I didn't criticize Romo after I commented on a bad throw from Dak in a preseason game. I responded to that by referencing a post I made criticizing Romo on the exact play you said I didn't say anything about. Like I said before, that shut you up for a while.
Then during the season I argued Romo should've been given a chance to play because in 2016 Tony was a better QB than Dak. I argued that Dak was having a great year but he was limited when compared to Tony. I thought Tony was more dangerous against a run look and pointed to 2014 as evidence.
I argued that Dak didn't have a great arm and he had to get better from the pocket if he wanted to stay effective in the league. I said if Tony was fine with it he should be allowed to risk his body while guys like yourself were literally acting like saints who were saving Tony from himself. As I said, I wish that old site were still around.
I praised Dak's development since. Even recently I said we have to hope he improves, meaning I'm not doom and gloom going forward. He is much better now than he was as a rookie. I said recently that the criticism he's getting is, "next level," criticism, i.e. the kind of criticism you give to an elite player. Dak is a good QB. I've never said otherwise.
When you call me a Romosexual, it's when I'm making a criticism of Dak. You do it to minimize what I'm saying. What you should know by now is I use receipts. When I say, "He missed a read," it's backed up by timestamps, specific plays, and confidence to what I'm referring. I'm always open to discussion and have even had my mind changed.
But you poison the well. You come in and immediately start with ad hominems. You don't do this all the time, but you do it with Dak criticism. It's boring and lazy. I don't get why you need an enemy on a fan site, but you find a lot of them.