Twitter: Tad is Chirpin’ Again

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,504
Reaction score
46,924
Ya, well Brady and Rodgers have both won a SB and lot of playoff games. Brady- 35 playoff wins. Rodgers - 11 playoff wins. And by the way, Rodgers is taking a lot of heat, just not on this board. Dak hasn't done squat. Dak doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because he hasn't proven he can put the team on his shoulders and lead them to victory., The bigger the spotlight, the smaller Dak gets.
Bunch of lies. Dak has been the opposite (in bold^^^), except for this past playoff game.
 

bonafidebanter

Well-Known Member
Messages
863
Reaction score
857
Okay, take my post and wherever I said "hate" replace it with "blame" instead.

My point still stands.

Rodgers and Brady don't get the BLAME like Dak because they have earned the benefit of the doubt. They are Champions and multiple times MVPs. What has Dak done to earn the benefit of the doubt from anybody?

So, you ignore blame when it comes to multiple times MVPs and SB champs? I blame them all the time. I'm not blind and actually watch the games. Hell, I grade champions and multiple MVP's even harder BECAUSE they've don't it. They don't get a pass when they lose to inferior QBs, EVER. I actually hold their feet to the fire. Just because you've done great in the past, it doesn't excuse your failures now, in the present. D4k is no where as good as these guys, but I still hold him accountable when I have to. When you fail, I don't blame deflect around you. YOU are the campion or MVP, you hold that "L" just like the rest of them. D4k doesn't get any "benefit of any doubt" around here, but you got to hold these guys accountable for failing too. That's all brother Tad is saying. Not that hard.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,336
Reaction score
44,087
Even Troy Aikman, Michael Irvin, Emmitt Smith and a few other great ex-players condemned Romo's Cabo decision during the playoffs and the limelight seeking Romo was in during his early starting prime years. But it's clear to you Romosexuals you know more than them.

That’s what I thought.

Don’t try to masquerade as some objective observer.

You’re a self-admitted hater and you can add hypocrite to the name badge too, luulz.
 

bonafidebanter

Well-Known Member
Messages
863
Reaction score
857
Ya, well Brady and Rodgers have both won a SB and lot of playoff games. Brady- 35 playoff wins. Rodgers - 11 playoff wins. And by the way, Rodgers is taking a lot of heat, just not on this board. Dak hasn't done squat. Dak doesn't get the benefit of the doubt because he hasn't proven he can put the team on his shoulders and lead them to victory., The bigger the spotlight, the smaller Dak gets.

I guess that huge spotlight made Thomas Edwina Patrick Brady produce a 14 QBR and Aaron Rodgers produce 10 pts and no passig TDs. It's ok, even with all of their accomplishments, they can still be held accountable for their losses. You don't get passes. You can take this blame along with the L into the off season. Just like D4k. People who say crap like "benefit of the doubt" probably believe in participation trophies too.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,504
Reaction score
46,924
That’s what I thought.

Don’t try to masquerade as some objective observer.

You’re a self-admitted hater and you can add hypocrite to the name badge too, luulz.
Yeah, I hate hypocrite, lying fans who praise other QBs while bashing their own who do nothing but bleed football and practice hard every year to keep getting better.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,504
Reaction score
46,924
So, you ignore blame when it comes to multiple times MVPs and SB champs? I blame them all the time. I'm not blind and actually watch the games. Hell, I grade champions and multiple MVP's even harder BECAUSE they've don't it. They don't get a pass when they lose to inferior QBs, EVER. I actually hold their feet to the fire. Just because you've done great in the past, it doesn't excuse your failures now, in the present. D4k is no where as good as these guys, but I still hold him accountable when I have to. When you fail, I don't blame deflect around you. YOU are the campion or MVP, you hold that "L" just like the rest of them. D4k doesn't get any "benefit of any doubt" around here, but you got to hold these guys accountable for failing too. That's all brother Tad is saying. Not that hard.
No use talking to him. He simply hates Dak and trolls every day against anyone who supports Dak.
 

MoistMayonnaise

Devil's Advocate
Messages
4,292
Reaction score
7,738
I guess that huge spotlight made Thomas Edwina Patrick Brady produce a 14 QBR and Aaron Rodgers produce 10 pts and no passig TDs. It's ok, even with all of their accomplishments, they can still be held accountable for their losses. You don't get passes. You can take this blame along with the L into the off season. Just like D4k. People who say crap like "benefit of the doubt" probably believe in participation trophies too.

Listen dude. This is a cowboys board. If you want to see Rodgers or Brady bashing go to one of their boards, I'm sure there is plenty of it. If you want to be a Dak apologist that's fine by me.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,504
Reaction score
46,924
Ok. Let's do it again for a new audience.

One of our first interactions in the Dak/Romo debate on the old site was you saying I didn't criticize Romo after I commented on a bad throw from Dak in a preseason game. I responded to that by referencing a post I made criticizing Romo on the exact play you said I didn't say anything about. Like I said before, that shut you up for a while.

Then during the season I argued Romo should've been given a chance to play because in 2016 Tony was a better QB than Dak. I argued that Dak was having a great year but he was limited when compared to Tony. I thought Tony was more dangerous against a run look and pointed to 2014 as evidence.

I argued that Dak didn't have a great arm and he had to get better from the pocket if he wanted to stay effective in the league. I said if Tony was fine with it he should be allowed to risk his body while guys like yourself were literally acting like saints who were saving Tony from himself. As I said, I wish that old site were still around.

I praised Dak's development since. Even recently I said we have to hope he improves, meaning I'm not doom and gloom going forward. He is much better now than he was as a rookie. I said recently that the criticism he's getting is, "next level," criticism, i.e. the kind of criticism you give to an elite player. Dak is a good QB. I've never said otherwise.

When you call me a Romosexual, it's when I'm making a criticism of Dak. You do it to minimize what I'm saying. What you should know by now is I use receipts. When I say, "He missed a read," it's backed up by timestamps, specific plays, and confidence to what I'm referring. I'm always open to discussion and have even had my mind changed.

But you poison the well. You come in and immediately start with ad hominems. You don't do this all the time, but you do it with Dak criticism. It's boring and lazy. I don't get why you need an enemy on a fan site, but you find a lot of them.
Just because you agreed Romo made 1 bad throw back then does not hide the fact you were a diehard Romosexual just like you are now.
 

bonafidebanter

Well-Known Member
Messages
863
Reaction score
857
Listen dude. This is a cowboys board. If you want to see Rodgers or Brady bashing go to one of their boards, I'm sure there is plenty of it. If you want to be a Dak apologist that's fine by me.

Uh, I did go just see if their fans are like ours. Ya, see, it's funny when I see 10xs more blame for our "mediocre" QB to these championship caliber QBs who actually played worse than D4k. I see blame deflection and excuses. Bruh, all that I'm doing is agreeing with the OP of Tad's tweet. Who are you to tell me what to do and how I can respond to a post on cowboyszone.com? If you don't have anything constructive to add or answer Tad's question, what are you doing here?
 

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
Just because you agreed Romo made 1 bad throw back then does not hide the fact you were a diehard Romosexual just like you are now.

What does that even mean? What does that have to do with me saying Dak missed a read? Like I said- you're here to poison the well.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
Uh, I did go just see if their fans are like ours. Ya, see, it's funny when I see 10xs more blame for our "mediocre" QB to these championship caliber QBs who actually played worse than D4k. I see blame deflection and excuses. Bruh, all that I'm doing is agreeing with the OP of Tad's tweet. Who are you to tell me what to do and how I can respond to a post on cowboyszone.com? If you don't have anything constructive to add or answer Tad's question, what are you doing here?


this board has some hypocrites for sure....Again anyone who blames Dak and obsolves Rodgers FOR THIS CURRENT YEAR PLAYOFF LOSS TO THE SAME TEAM..is not fooling anyone. Again I'm all for Dak getting his fair share of blame, but lets be honest Rodgers defense gave him a way better shot at a win and he couldnt do it...those are the facts.
 

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
Of course. Too bad they didn't know you from the old boards like I did.

You realize there are a lot of posters here from the old board, right? You think the people who don't know are the one's giving the likes and putting in their $.02? Those people are most likely bored by the back and forth.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
35,888
Reaction score
13,460
this board has some hypocrites for sure....Again anyone who blames Dak and obsolves Rodgers FOR THIS CURRENT YEAR PLAYOFF LOSS TO THE SAME TEAM..is not fooling anyone. Again I'm all for Dak getting his fair share of blame, but lets be honest Rodgers defense gave him a way better shot at a win and he couldnt do it...those are the facts.

Very different team, different weather conditions, etc. Football is not static, you of all people should know this.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,137
Reaction score
10,115
Very different team, different weather conditions, etc. Football is not static, you of all people should know this.

Come on man, again were they not the best team in the NFC this year...dont remeber people saying what a farse thier season was...and again you can use the weather but it looks silly after 15 years of "You got to play Rodgers on the frozen tundra" but now its..That crazy low tem game in GB in january snuck up Rodgers?
 
Top