Twitter: Cowboys working to re-sign Kearse

If Wilson gives us "similar results" he'll be in the tub by Game 5 .... again. As I schooled your likes leader bro, Kearse has been playing well since he was inserted as a full time starter which goes back beyond his 1 year with us in our scheme. He was used mostly as a special teamer in Minnesota and when Detroit put him in full time he did well which got our attention in the first place. He's key for this defense so you do your best to get it done instead of being histrionic about spending money. Can't have Dollar Tree value at every position. We got that for a year. Talent costs.

your ignorance is revealed by facts

How long has Kearse been in the NFL?
If he’s so irreplaceable why has he never started before?

He’s a one trick poney good close to LOS only. We have Wilson and this is a great safety draft. He’s totally replaceable

He’s good in THIS defense. As soon as Quinn decided to stay his market dried up

As I said, we better not overpay for him
 
your ignorance is revealed by facts

How long has Kearse been in the NFL?
If he’s so irreplaceable why has he never started before?

He’s a one trick poney good close to LOS only. We gave Wilson and this us a great safety draft. He’s totally replaceable

He’s good in THIS defense. As soon as Quinn decided to stay his market dried up

As I said, we better not overpay for him

Why did Schultz never start before he did? Or Demarco Murray? It happens in the NFL, doesn't it? When he got a chance he shined. He could have shined in Minnesota but they had Harrison Smith and Sendejo ahead of him. He needed a chance, got one and delivered. THEN delivered with us. So you can stop with the 1-year nonsense because I debunked that already.

And don't ignore that Wilson hasn't been reliable. What good is he injured every year? He goes down again, then what?

Kearse was good in DETROIT'S defense as well (as a full time starter) which is why we took a looksie and were rewarded. How about them facts, dum dum? Lol.

We get it. Don't pay anyone and feel like you got a steal. But you want to gamble with someone unreliable in the past and a rookie when you have a known quantity in THIS defense? Foolish.
 
They love to bid against themselves don't they?

This better be a bargain.

He played well but was probably well suited for the system. I don't know if I go throwing 6-7m a year at him.
 
Why did Schultz never start before he did? Or Demarco Murray? It happens in the NFL, doesn't it? When he got a chance he shined. He could have shined in Minnesota but they had Harrison Smith and Sendejo ahead of him. He needed a chance, got one and delivered. THEN delivered with us. So you can stop with the 1-year nonsense because I debunked that already.

And don't ignore that Wilson hasn't been reliable. What good is he injured every year? He goes down again, then what?

Kearse was good in DETROIT'S defense as well (as a full time starter) which is why we took a looksie and were rewarded. How about them facts, dum dum? Lol.

We get it. Don't pay anyone and feel like you got a steal. But you want to gamble with someone unreliable in the past and a rookie when you have a known quantity in THIS defense? Foolish.

LOL, the Schulz comp is dead on
He’s a good not great TE just like Kearse is good not great
Thank you for making my point
 
My bet is NE swoops in and signs him. He’s a Bill kind of guy
 
LOL, the Schulz comp is dead on
He’s a good not great TE just like Kearse is good not great
Thank you for making my point

He is not bad either, Hell he was 3rd in the NFL in terms of TE,, So I guess all these other TE suck, after all they did not get the receptions he had, they did not put up the TD he had.
 
LOL, the Schulz comp is dead on
He’s a good not great TE just like Kearse is good not great
Thank you for making my point

Nice try. Schultz is not as important to the offense as Kearse is to the defense. The point I was making, that you're attempting to ignore, is that talent sometimes languishes on the bench when they have the goods to start and do well. It flies in the face of your "only 1 year" bull which is why you never address how Kearse was used in his career until recently. Still not going to address his year in Detroit? Uh huh, I thought not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR
Have there been projections on Wilson?


https://www.espn.com/blog/dallas-co...i-cooper-dalton-schultz-and-other-key-cowboys


Cedrick Wilson is set to cash in
Among the combine chatter last week was how well Wilson was going to do in free agency, which was not good news for the Cowboys.

Multiple sources believe Wilson could be in line for a deal that averages $6 million to $8 million a year. The Cowboys might be able to make the low end of that market work but not the high end, even if they cut Cooper. (This is with the assumption Gallup will be retained.)
 
#1 guy I hope we retain. Get it done.
 
https://www.espn.com/blog/dallas-co...i-cooper-dalton-schultz-and-other-key-cowboys


Cedrick Wilson is set to cash in
Among the combine chatter last week was how well Wilson was going to do in free agency, which was not good news for the Cowboys.

Multiple sources believe Wilson could be in line for a deal that averages $6 million to $8 million a year. The Cowboys might be able to make the low end of that market work but not the high end, even if they cut Cooper. (This is with the assumption Gallup will be retained.)

I like Wilson, but I wouldn't spend that on him. Give Malik Turner more opportunities and spend the money elsewhere.
 
Better not over pay
He’s played well for only 1 year in this scheme only
His market is limited and Wilson can give us pretty similar results much cheaper

Except he can't. Never played to the level Kearse did. Not even close.
 
Except he can't. Never played to the level Kearse did. Not even close.

And he has played in Quinn’s defense for how many years?

What were you saying about Kearse BEFORE he played in Quinn’s defense?
 
Wilson is a much better, cheaper signing than Gallup. You can sign Wilson and Turner for less than Gallup gets and don't have to worry about a guy coming off a knee injury.
 
Nice try. Schultz is not as important to the offense as Kearse is to the defense. The point I was making, that you're attempting to ignore, is that talent sometimes languishes on the bench when they have the goods to start and do well. It flies in the face of your "only 1 year" bull which is why you never address how Kearse was used in his career until recently. Still not going to address his year in Detroit? Uh huh, I thought not.

“how Kearse was used” basically makes my point. He’s good close to LOS only and only in this defense

his market is limited so we shouldn’t over pay

again, you’re making it too easy by making my points

:laugh:
 
your ignorance is revealed by facts

How long has Kearse been in the NFL?
If he’s so irreplaceable why has he never started before?

He’s a one trick poney good close to LOS only. We have Wilson and this is a great safety draft. He’s totally replaceable

He’s good in THIS defense. As soon as Quinn decided to stay his market dried up

As I said, we better not overpay for him

Pretty sure his coverage stats on TEs led the league. He was among league leaders in passes defensed.
 
Wilson is a much better, cheaper signing than Gallup. You can sign Wilson and Turner for less than Gallup gets and don't have to worry about a guy coming off a knee injury.
No chance.

You sign Gallup and Wilson to go with Lamb. You draft a shifty WR or sign a guy like Crowder/Humphries.

You sign Turner and you give him the Noah Brown role. Special teams, #4 WR, takes reps when a starter goes down.
 
He is not bad either, Hell he was 3rd in the NFL in terms of TE,, So I guess all these other TE suck, after all they did not get the receptions he had, they did not put up the TD he had.

did you bother to watch him? You think he’s worth a franchise tag at 11 million?
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,556
Messages
14,545,521
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top