and I can name you about 15 teams at least that have done what you said. Hired a "Real Football," man to be GM. Let him hire the HC and develop a plan. and yada yada yada.... then after about 3-4 years, fire everyone and repeat that winning formula all over again. A few of them hit the jackpot at QB, and then all the other moves just seem to look so much better.
Reid…When was the last time an NFL owner won a SB also being the GM? Twenty six years ago when Jerry hoisted the team’s last Lombardi. With a team built by Jimmy Johnson. That was the last time an NFL owner who didn’t hire a GM won a SB.
How long ago was that SB? Tony Romo was 15. Dak was 2. More than half the current Cowboys roster wasn’t even born yet. I was 37; now I’m 63.
The winning owners of the last 26 Lombardis - 100% of them- realize they need someone else to run the team. If you’re arguing that all the owners winning SBs just got lucky because of the QB they had, you seem to be forgetting QBs like Jim McMahon, Phil Simms, Jeff Hostetler, Joe Theissman, Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, Trent Dilfer, and Nick Foles.
Great teams win SBs. Most of those great teams do have great QBs. But they also have complete complimentary rosters that work together, not just a collection of stars. But if a great QB is all you need, why did Marino never win one? Drew Brees only won one. Aaron Rodgers in all his glory has one. Russell Wilson has only won one. Mahomes is young but is he guaranteed to win another without a better roster around him?
Why is hiring a GM better? Because those men can be held accountable for failure. The Jones model has proven that with zero accountability comes zero SBs.