CalPolyTechnique
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 27,383
- Reaction score
- 44,174
I literally thought this was going to be a thread about Tank changing his diet this off-season.
And don't even think that it's a rare occurrenceAn NFL owner recently tried to pay his coach to lose games. Yeah, I believe it.
It was clear that JJ was upset after the SF loss as he did not immediately give a vote of confidence to MM’s return. He talks up Quinn as a potential HC. The relationship between MM and the FO seems icy and tense now— a far cry from the sleepover pajama days of 2020.
Since the SF loss? JJ trades, restructures, and cuts bloated salary and unwanted players from the roster.
MM is 2 years into a 5 year deal. JJ is paying him whether he is HC or not. Do you bring in a new HC and pay two guys while you adjust your roster and try and solve your cap issues?
Or do you pay the current HC and saddle him with roster reforms that will lead to a justifiable firing after a mediocre year— while at the same time clearing cap and roster issues to set up your next HC in a decent position?
I think the FO is making some course corrections and are allowing McCarthy to “go down with the ship” in order to be in a better position in 2023 with either Quinn or Payton installed as HC.
This is the only strategy that makes any sense— considering the mood and moves made this offseason.
I am not saying I am in support of this strategy— just mulling over the current state of the franchise and the puzzling decisions of the FO. But— if you want out of some bad decisions you have made in terms of contracts, you are going to have to face the music at some point and eat a crap sandwich.
Best to eat those sandwiches in one bite rather than a nibble here or there. Is it possible that this strange offseason is evidence that the FO is allowing this season to tank in order get out from some bad moves and deals with their eyes on 2023?
They don’t handle the day to day. So their off field issues would have nothing to do with that and would actually be more likely to have a splash in order to provide distraction.It's the only way this offseason makes sense.
He was so embarrassed with our playoff loss that he did ... absolutely nothing to make the team better.
There is also another angle--the Joneses are too busy quelling their many legal issues to fully focus on the football team. Of course, that's what happens when you insist on being owner and playing GM at the same time
It was clear that JJ was upset after the SF loss as he did not immediately give a vote of confidence to MM’s return. He talks up Quinn as a potential HC. The relationship between MM and the FO seems icy and tense now— a far cry from the sleepover pajama days of 2020.
Since the SF loss? JJ trades, restructures, and cuts bloated salary and unwanted players from the roster.
MM is 2 years into a 5 year deal. JJ is paying him whether he is HC or not. Do you bring in a new HC and pay two guys while you adjust your roster and try and solve your cap issues?
Or do you pay the current HC and saddle him with roster reforms that will lead to a justifiable firing after a mediocre year— while at the same time clearing cap and roster issues to set up your next HC in a decent position?
I think the FO is making some course corrections and are allowing McCarthy to “go down with the ship” in order to be in a better position in 2023 with either Quinn or Payton installed as HC.
This is the only strategy that makes any sense— considering the mood and moves made this offseason.
I am not saying I am in support of this strategy— just mulling over the current state of the franchise and the puzzling decisions of the FO. But— if you want out of some bad decisions you have made in terms of contracts, you are going to have to face the music at some point and eat a crap sandwich.
Best to eat those sandwiches in one bite rather than a nibble here or there. Is it possible that this strange offseason is evidence that the FO is allowing this season to tank in order get out from some bad moves and deals with their eyes on 2023?
Are you saying that the Cowboys are tanking and so letting MM hang around for that?
If thats your angle its laughable. The Cowboys are continuing to improve and restructure the roster from past mistakes. Getting rid of the right people when they can and keeping the right players. Cant fault anything they have done so far. Heck even balking on Gregory was probably the right thing to do. Sadly we cant get rid of zeke until after this season. I see 2023 being the year we round out the roster with FA and another year of the draft.
Looks like Joseph may be toast, but at least we found out at the right time. It allows us to possibly fill that hole in the draft and may help stop Jones from doing something dumb this year with our 2nd round pick like he usually does.
Makes as much sense as any other theory.It was clear that JJ was upset after the SF loss as he did not immediately give a vote of confidence to MM’s return. He talks up Quinn as a potential HC. The relationship between MM and the FO seems icy and tense now— a far cry from the sleepover pajama days of 2020.
Since the SF loss? JJ trades, restructures, and cuts bloated salary and unwanted players from the roster.
MM is 2 years into a 5 year deal. JJ is paying him whether he is HC or not. Do you bring in a new HC and pay two guys while you adjust your roster and try and solve your cap issues?
Or do you pay the current HC and saddle him with roster reforms that will lead to a justifiable firing after a mediocre year— while at the same time clearing cap and roster issues to set up your next HC in a decent position?
I think the FO is making some course corrections and are allowing McCarthy to “go down with the ship” in order to be in a better position in 2023 with either Quinn or Payton installed as HC.
This is the only strategy that makes any sense— considering the mood and moves made this offseason.
I am not saying I am in support of this strategy— just mulling over the current state of the franchise and the puzzling decisions of the FO. But— if you want out of some bad decisions you have made in terms of contracts, you are going to have to face the music at some point and eat a crap sandwich.
Best to eat those sandwiches in one bite rather than a nibble here or there. Is it possible that this strange offseason is evidence that the FO is allowing this season to tank in order get out from some bad moves and deals with their eyes on 2023?
I think you are giving them too much credit. You seem to have them playing chess, when they seem incapable of even mastering checkers. I think they are just making bad decisionsIt was clear that JJ was upset after the SF loss as he did not immediately give a vote of confidence to MM’s return. He talks up Quinn as a potential HC. The relationship between MM and the FO seems icy and tense now— a far cry from the sleepover pajama days of 2020.
Since the SF loss? JJ trades, restructures, and cuts bloated salary and unwanted players from the roster.
MM is 2 years into a 5 year deal. JJ is paying him whether he is HC or not. Do you bring in a new HC and pay two guys while you adjust your roster and try and solve your cap issues?
Or do you pay the current HC and saddle him with roster reforms that will lead to a justifiable firing after a mediocre year— while at the same time clearing cap and roster issues to set up your next HC in a decent position?
I think the FO is making some course corrections and are allowing McCarthy to “go down with the ship” in order to be in a better position in 2023 with either Quinn or Payton installed as HC.
This is the only strategy that makes any sense— considering the mood and moves made this offseason.
I am not saying I am in support of this strategy— just mulling over the current state of the franchise and the puzzling decisions of the FO. But— if you want out of some bad decisions you have made in terms of contracts, you are going to have to face the music at some point and eat a crap sandwich.
Best to eat those sandwiches in one bite rather than a nibble here or there. Is it possible that this strange offseason is evidence that the FO is allowing this season to tank in order get out from some bad moves and deals with their eyes on 2023?
They truly think they are smarter then every other GM and team and are on the right path
Makes as much sense as any other theory.
They will defitnitly have less talent this year than last years team that was one and done.
If we do make the playoffs in a weak NFC Least, we will most likely be one and done again.
Why would Jerry need to tank to justify getting rid of McCarthy? His body of work thus far is already enough to let him go. If Jerry wants Peyton, it has nothing to do with the Cowboys 2022 season.
I think the obvious answer is they are incompetent (which has been proven beyond a doubt), and also distracted (distancing himself from his daughter, this stupid crypto thing)It's the only way this offseason makes sense.
He was so embarrassed with our playoff loss that he did ... absolutely nothing to make the team better.
There is also another angle--the Joneses are too busy quelling their many legal issues to fully focus on the football team. Of course, that's what happens when you insist on being owner and playing GM at the same time
For two reasons:
1. It’s not a good PR/brand image look to can a HC after he double his win total from the year before, goes 12-5, and wins the division for you. JJ will look to save face at all costs
2. He is paying him big money whether he is HC or not. This way— JJ is limiting outgoing expense to his HC while also setting him up to fail which will resolve point 1 after the season.
For two reasons:
1. It’s not a good PR/brand image look to can a HC after he double his win total from the year before, goes 12-5, and wins the division for you. JJ will look to save face at all costs
2. He is paying him big money whether he is HC or not. This way— JJ is limiting outgoing expense to his HC while also setting him up to fail which will resolve point 1 after the season.