What has Chauncey Golston done on the field to say he a better DT than Hill

[Dak_Attack_09]

This DL doesn’t need another tweener who hasn’t produced anything at DT or DE to deserve a roster spot over Hill.

 

[jwitten82]

This DL doesn’t need another tweener who hasn’t produced anything at DT or DE to deserve a roster spot over Hill.

Lol neither one has done anything to deserve a roster spot

 

[John813]

isaac alarcon went to Dan Quinn and told him Golston deserves the spot.

 

[Dak_Attack_09]

Lol neither one has done anything to deserve a roster spot

Hill has actually produced in regular season unlike Golston and doesn’t get abused in run defense.

 

[Oz-of-Cowboy-Country]

Who's been here the longest?
Can you give us a stat comparison? If you want us to decide who stays, we should know what they've done.

 

[Big_D]

Ones in year 2 and the other is in year 4 and hasn’t shown much of anything. If Golston hasn’t done anything by 2024 then we’ll have a legit comparison!

 

[CowboyFrog]

you hit on the Alarcon thread, Have a beer, sit back puff on a Cuban...let that win marinate for a sec before starting the thread machine again.

 

[Jarntt]

Hill has actually produced in regular season unlike Golston and doesn’t get abused in run defense.

No he hasn't

On Golston: he isn't a DT, at least on early downs so playing him there would be a huge mistake IMO. He'll get blown off the line against the run. But let's look at the stats and do so knowing he was a rookie and should improve:

Golston
Seasons: 1
Sacks: 1
QB hits: 4
tackles: 32

Hill and to be clear, this is 3 years combined
Seasons: 3
Sacks: 0.5
QB hits: 8
tackles: 27

I'm not saying those are stats you'd pump your chest about for Golston, but your comment that about Hill at least produced in the regular season doesn't even make sense.

 

[stilltheguru]

No he hasn't

On Golston: he isn't a DT, at least on early downs so playing him there would be a huge mistake IMO. He'll get blown off the line against the run. But let's look at the stats and do so knowing he was a rookie and should improve:

Golston
Seasons: 1
Sacks: 1
QB hits: 4
tackles: 32

Hill and to be clear, this is 3 years combined
Seasons: 3
Sacks: 0.5
QB hits: 8
tackles: 27

I'm not saying those are stats you'd pump your chest about for Golston, but your comment that about Hill at least produced in the regular season doesn't even make sense.

 

[ondaedg]

This DL doesn’t need another tweener who hasn’t produced anything at DT or DE to deserve a roster spot over Hill.

The one thing I like about Hill is he keeps on fighting even as he is getting steamrolled to the opposing team’s bench. He’s got a motor!

 

[CWR]

So far not much. King of hot takes, this one falls short. Lol

 

[jwitten82]

No he hasn't

On Golston: he isn't a DT, at least on early downs so playing him there would be a huge mistake IMO. He'll get blown off the line against the run. But let's look at the stats and do so knowing he was a rookie and should improve:

Golston
Seasons: 1
Sacks: 1
QB hits: 4
tackles: 32

Hill and to be clear, this is 3 years combined
Seasons: 3
Sacks: 0.5
QB hits: 8
tackles: 27

I'm not saying those are stats you'd pump your chest about for Golston, but your comment that about Hill at least produced in the regular season doesn't even make sense.

Lol exactly, hill is a bust.

 

[CWR]

you hit on the Alarcon thread, Have a beer, sit back puff on a Cuban...let that win marinate for a sec before starting the thread machine again.

If anyone should take the time to savor a victory it's him. He's like the Detroit Lions of this message board. Lol

 

[sbark]

It appears Gholston is much more available on Sunday's
Coaches seem to like that attribute in a player

 

[G2]

you hit on the Alarcon thread, Have a beer, sit back puff on a Cuban...let that win marinate for a sec before starting the thread machine again.

He's clearly smoked enough.

 

[Acceptablename]

This DL doesn’t need another tweener who hasn’t produced anything at DT or DE to deserve a roster spot over Hill.

Different player and bill.is in last season

 

[Dak_Attack_09]

It appears Gholston is much more available on Sunday's
Coaches seem to like that attribute in a player

If he is available and can’t to do the job at all it’s even more worthless. Hill is the better player and produces, if they let broke back Tyron play part-time then they can let Hill!

 

[Dak_Attack_09]

No he hasn't

On Golston: he isn't a DT, at least on early downs so playing him there would be a huge mistake IMO. He'll get blown off the line against the run. But let's look at the stats and do so knowing he was a rookie and should improve:

Golston
Seasons: 1
Sacks: 1
QB hits: 4
tackles: 32

Hill and to be clear, this is 3 years combined
Seasons: 3
Sacks: 0.5
QB hits: 8
tackles: 27

I'm not saying those are stats you'd pump your chest about for Golston, but your comment that about Hill at least produced in the regular season doesn't even make sense.

DEs are supposed to get sacks and he got one with that many opportunities.

DTs play is far different with focus on stopping the run with double team.

 

[Aerolithe_Lion]

Here we are again, OP bashing a cowboy disguised as propping another one up

 

[TwentyOne]

This DL doesn’t need another tweener who hasn’t produced anything at DT or DE to deserve a roster spot over Hill.

Good question.

I expect your detailed analysis at the end of the week.

Lets go you have work to do!