LVE continues to be weak link

Beaker42

Beaker42

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,127
Reaction score
7,414
conner01 said:
I trust the staff more than fans on who should be playing
I’d like to know what’s going on with Cox but obviously something is keeping him from playing time
Click to expand...
Right, because the eye test lies. Seeing him get to plays an hour after it's over and then get carried like a child on his dad's back for 4-5 yards EVERY TIME. He is pure garbage.
 
Rockport

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,372
Reaction score
41,339
Starstruck22 said:
Nick Martin had has way with wolf boy (as well as other blockers) Couple first quarter plays but after that nothing and a day late and a dollar short on most running plays. We will be destroyed by rams and philly on the ground game. Our stellar defense really covers for an incredibly ineffective LVE (and Barr to be honest). But we will be exposed the next two games unfortunately. Washington did expose us with the run on a number of plays. Offensive coordinators on good teams with run games will fully expose our weak link. That is why I suggested more safely play and Wilson and Bland really shined. I just don't see the point of LVE taking up a spot on the 11.
Click to expand...
 

Starstruck22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,637
Pass2Run said:
You obviously don't know what you're talking about. Sometimes, players have assignments, so they have to assure something before they make a play.

This was explained to you in another thread, but you still don't seem to get it.

Plus, if LVE is playing. What does that say about some of our other LBs?

If you remember, LVE was the only player who showed up in the San Fran game. I know we all love Parsons, but he disappeared.

We shall see over the next few games. He's more of a blue collar kind of player. Always has been. And that's not a bad thing. He just does the dirty work, like Noah used to on the offense.
Click to expand...
Wow, if the assignment is being feckless he sure is succeeding. He’s hit the mark I must admit.
 

Starstruck22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,637
xwalker said:
It's the best Cowboys defensive performances in over a decade but you're having a meltdown about it...

Vander Esch played 92% of the snaps...He is not 'out' on 3rd downs per se.
Click to expand...
He was out on most third downs.
 

Starstruck22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,637
xwalker said:
It's the best Cowboys defensive performances in over a decade but you're having a meltdown about it...

Vander Esch played 92% of the snaps...He is not 'out' on 3rd downs per se.
Click to expand...
Not due to anything wolf boy did. And look at the team. Bottom of the barrel.
 

Starstruck22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,637
Beaker42 said:
The way things are looking, our first two picks need to be LB's. Ours suck in pretty mech every facet of the position.
Click to expand...
Really a lot of people on here seem to think every thing is fine and that LVE is exceptional. Interesting. I agree 100%. LB is number one and then defensive line.
 

Starstruck22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,637
Beaker42 said:
Right, because the eye test lies. Seeing him get to plays an hour after it's over and then get carried like a child on his dad's back for 4-5 yards EVERY TIME. He is pure garbage.
Click to expand...
Pure garbage is accurate. Why people continue to think he is solid is way beyond my and others comprehension. To argue he is all we have is one thing but solid is another. I would rather have Wilson and Kearse in there. They can cover the run and pass
 

Starstruck22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,637
Rockport said:
Click to expand...

We must be in alternate universes. Number of tackles means nothing if you are on the backend or everthing and getting blocked until 3 other guys make the stop and you join them. The best example is the play where he tackled Parsons tackling the runner. That was one of his tackles. Are you kidding me?????
 
Rockport

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
41,372
Reaction score
41,339
Starstruck22 said:
We must be in alternate universes. Number of tackles means nothing if you are on the backend or everthing and getting blocked until 3 other guys make the stop and you join them. The best example is the play where he tackled Parsons tackling the runner. That was one of his tackles. Are you kidding me?????
Click to expand...
He’s playing his role well.
 

Starstruck22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,637
xwalker said:
LVE had 8 total tackles vs Washington...

Nobody agrees with your nonsensical postings...
Click to expand...
Then you are not reading it all…many have similar sentiments. You are as blind to LVE play as you are to postings. And i dont do polls. I trust my eyes. And of course you have no argument otherwise you would post it. I support my position with facts and dont engage in ad hominems.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top