Was there a reason why Kellen was so predictable?

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
31,125
Reaction score
26,460
Was there a reason why we were so predictable, was there a reason why Kellen didn't call certain plays for dak, have dak throw it deep more, why we use so many curl routes, etc etc? We have a lot to say about him, but is there a reason why he was so limited in doing what he did? Please give your thoughts!
 
Was there a reason why we were so predictable, was there a reason why Kellen didn't call certain plays for dak, have dak throw it deep more, why we use so many curl routes, etc etc? We have a lot to say about him, but is there a reason why he was so limited in doing what he did? Please give your thoughts!
The effectiveness of this offense is rooted in your ability to successfully and consistently run the football. This is not the greatest show on turf in personnel or design. IF you cannot run the football, it can and will be rendered ineffective. Especially against GOOD teams!

We did not see it much in the 90s because we could run the football...on ANYBODY! And when we couldn't, the defense held it down. To win at a championship level...you have to have a complete team. Don't let the popularity of the triplets in the 90s discount the fact the Cowboys were a complete team.
 
Hard to tell. I’m not sure this offense is any more predictable than most other offenses. The offensive play calling and offensive operation in general would look good without the interceptions. Short of Shanahan or Reid, all offenses are fairly predictable especially if you watch your team every game year after year.

I would have liked to see this Kellen Moore offense when he doesn’t have to appease Zeke with useless carries, which I think is a mandate from Jerry.
 
Was there a reason why we were so predictable, was there a reason why Kellen didn't call certain plays for dak, have dak throw it deep more, why we use so many curl routes, etc etc? We have a lot to say about him, but is there a reason why he was so limited in doing what he did? Please give your thoughts!
As a guess, we don't throw deep more often because we lacked speed on the outside. Too many curl routes, because lack of consistent ability to get separation. There's also the question about Dak's accuracy on digs, slants, crossers etc., but don't want to compound that with WRs that struggle to get seperation.

I have no idea why he wouldn't have used Pollard more as a pass catcher, much like CMC, Kamara, Ekler etc. In their respective offenses those are high percentage throws and basically like long handoffs.
 
Flim don't lie......failure of in-game adjustments......scheme forced on talent or lack thereof on the field. Offense and OC overated.
 
The effectiveness of this offense is rooted in your ability to successfully and consistently run the football. This is not the greatest show on turf in personnel or design. IF you cannot run the football, it can and will be rendered ineffective. Especially against GOOD teams!

We did not see it much in the 90s because we could run the football...on ANYBODY! And when we couldn't, the defense held it down. To win at a championship level...you have to have a complete team. Don't let the popularity of the triplets in the 90s discount the fact the Cowboys were a complete team.


Agree to that!!
 
Was there a reason why we were so predictable, was there a reason why Kellen didn't call certain plays for dak, have dak throw it deep more, why we use so many curl routes, etc etc? We have a lot to say about him, but is there a reason why he was so limited in doing what he did? Please give your thoughts!
Sometimes it’s simply execution and we don’t always execute well.
 
Hard to tell. I’m not sure this offense is any more predictable than most other offenses. The offensive play calling and offensive operation in general would look good without the interceptions. Short of Shanahan or Reid, all offenses are fairly predictable especially if you watch your team every game year after year.

I would have liked to see this Kellen Moore offense when he doesn’t have to appease Zeke with useless carries, which I think is a mandate from Jerry.


I love you lol lol lol the last few sentences sums it all up!!!!
 
As a guess, we don't throw deep more often because we lacked speed on the outside. Too many curl routes, because lack of consistent ability to get separation. There's also the question about Dak's accuracy on digs, slants, crossers etc., but don't want to compound that with WRs that struggle to get seperation.

I have no idea why he wouldn't have used Pollard more as a pass catcher, much like CMC, Kamara, Ekler etc. In their respective offenses those are high percentage throws and basically like long handoffs.


What about Dak not being able to get the ball deep to players. Usually they have to turn back to get the ball
 
What about Dak not being able to get the ball deep to players. Usually they have to turn back to get the ball
I think that's overblown, Dak, he's not Rodgers or Wilson, in their prime, but has a decent deep ball. Our deep threat is Gallup, who ran a 4.5+, that was before his injuries, so he isn't consistently getting a step on many people. Deep throws, like the 60+ yder to Hilton are low percentage for any QB, but not something you're likely to call often when you know you don't have speed. A lot of deep passes aren't QBs trying to hit a guy in stride, it's about putting air under it and letting your guy run under it, we don't have a WR like that.

If we had a Hill or Chase, there would be more deep balls being called. We kinda do with Turpin and that's another thing I didn't understand why we wouldn't have tried at least a few times with him....
 
Was there a reason why we were so predictable, was there a reason why Kellen didn't call certain plays for dak, have dak throw it deep more, why we use so many curl routes, etc etc? We have a lot to say about him, but is there a reason why he was so limited in doing what he did? Please give your thoughts!
He hasn't learned what to do in game time situations. I don't doubt that he's a smart guy but he lacks the ability to play chess with the guy right in front of him on the other side of the field. Just like Garrett, he didn't spend time learning what to do during the game.
 
The effectiveness of this offense is rooted in your ability to successfully and consistently run the football. This is not the greatest show on turf in personnel or design. IF you cannot run the football, it can and will be rendered ineffective. Especially against GOOD teams!

We did not see it much in the 90s because we could run the football...on ANYBODY! And when we couldn't, the defense held it down. To win at a championship level...you have to have a complete team. Don't let the popularity of the triplets in the 90s discount the fact the Cowboys were a complete team.
So true. Airman was much more accurate , the receivers could run timing routes., we had a FB who was a pass catcher also. A deep shot to Irvin to get into opposing territory then grind them with Emmitt

Winning formula not repeatable with todays QB and players. Surprised we have won 12 games in consecutive years with our current scheme
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,596
Messages
13,820,850
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top