Still should add a veteran running back-couple of options

Drafted RBs can usually step right in roll. And this is a great class.

Meanwhile RBs in their fourth, fifth season are usually already in decline. I'll pass on veteran RB.
Nothing wrong with rostering 3 backs, as long as they can play special teams
 
Last edited:
Nothing wrong with rostering 3 backs, as long as they can play special teams

Doubt the top-ten FA backs have played ST in a long time. Young draftees are faster, hungrier, cheaper with less vanity. We got Pollard and Malik Davis. If I'm thirsty at RB at all...only want rookie juice.
 
I would bet that we are done signing/trading anything meaningful until the draft. Unless something that can’t be refused comes along. The view in front offices is current players are the cheapest during the draft, hopefully that is the case this year with a vet WR. As for running backs, if we sign a vet that will also be after the draft. When they would be more likely to sign for the vet minimum.
 
Pollard is the veteran back. Dallas is “still paying” Zeke. How many veteran backs need to be on the payroll?
 
Doubt the top-ten FA backs have played ST in a long time. Young draftees are faster, hungrier, cheaper with less vanity. We got Pollard and Malik Davis. If I'm thirsty at RB at all...only want rookie juice.
If the draft a running back, he could also play on special teams. Pollard did that for the Cowboys when he was our #2 back.
 
Fournette is not hungry anymore. That is why I am glad we tagged Pollard. You need hungry backs to earn their salaries.
Have you seen his belly. Hell ya. He looks like hevis always hungry. But might be a good pickup for a few carries a game at a discount.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,635
Messages
14,549,013
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top