TheMarathonContinues
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 75,609
- Reaction score
- 70,037
What’s false?False on the second portion.
What’s false?False on the second portion.
Right but typically the media would’ve reported soon as Dak didn’t agree to her 100 million demand.They would. They have people who are paid to watch those court dockets and report this stuff. Just seems like it because to my knowledge, the first communication was a letter to Dak saying to pay up or it would come out in the press and courts. Dak counter-sues, they are forced to do their thing, and here we are.
you would think the media would be talking about this 24x7 if something was serious about this sexual assault investigation, the fact there is hardly no mention of it, is odd to me.
Sexual assault investigation shouldn't be talked about here or anywhere else..Let the legal minds talk about it and certainly Doesn't Have a Place Here @ CZ
I wouldn't want to blow my cover telling a guy like you!!Wait.
YOU have sources?
The media has to be careful. You don’t want to jump on the player when he has not been charged with a crime. You don’t want to victim shame the woman. Believe me Skippy, Florio, and Shefter are looking for something to report.you would think the media would be talking about this 24x7 if something was serious about this sexual assault investigation, the fact there is hardly no mention of it, is odd to me.
Trust me. Your cover is safe with me.I wouldn't want to blow my cover telling a guy like you!!
I read a. Story, yesterday about Tyreke Hill smashing an unlit cigar in his wife's face and he isn't a CowboyI'd think the media would be talking about this 24x7 even if it wasnt something serious just because it's Cowboy related. IMO the media is waiting for details to come out.
Not sure I understand what you're getting at here?I read a. Story, yesterday about Tyreke Hill smashing an unlit cigar in his wife's face and he isn't a Cowboy
My point is that it doesn't have to be Cowboy related for the media to cover it.Not sure I understand what you're getting at here?
Thank heavens you're here to save the day!This forum has stumbled backward.
This guy...hilarious!The media can’t jump on anything they don’t know about. They don’t know anything about this case other then what Daks team has released.
FWIW, the first communication was private letter, it wasn't a lawsuit. In response, Dak sued her (he didn't "countersue" her).They would. They have people who are paid to watch those court dockets and report this stuff. Just seems like it because to my knowledge, the first communication was a letter to Dak saying to pay up or it would come out in the press and courts. Dak counter-sues, they are forced to do their thing, and here we are.
The media doesn't know more than the police, but the police know more than the public and often the media has sources with the police to leak to the public how the investigation is going. I expect eventually we will get some sort of off-the-record update regarding precisely that.How would the media know before the legal system? I get that you are going to go out of your way trying to protect Dak at all costs, but it's ridiculous to assume the media knows more about this case than the police or courts.
You seem to be the only one with a issue…what did I say to offend you?This guy...hilarious!
Will say anything.....even as ridiculous as this....to run cover.
I think when you read the court documents and the womans attorney said "regardless of the damage this has caused, my client will forget it all for the low sum of a hundred million dollars" it leaves credibility at the door.30 years ago maybe. It was nowhere perfect way back when but fact-checking often keep stories on standby until more information surfaced.
Much of present day media typically promotes sensationalism. Too many 'journalists' are usually not precautious about running with a story despite lack of factual information.
I get that you're all over this complaining why it isn't more in the media since you hate Dak and want anything helpful to push him out.How would the media know before the legal system? I get that you are going to go out of your way trying to protect Dak at all costs, but it's ridiculous to assume the media knows more about this case than the police or courts.
And that is very possible, but with Tyreek Hill we have some specific details, and we also have him admitting he needs to clean up his behavior. It's a very easy story to run with with a clear victim.My point is that it doesn't have to be Cowboy related for the media to cover it.
The fact that it's not being covered leads me to believe their is a puff of smoke and no fire. At least I hope so.
What makes you think you offended me? Ridiculous.You seem to be the only one with a issue…what did I say to offend you?