But there is literally a 30+ page thread on the first page of this forum that says it'll probably be 10+ years before the Cowboys break .500 without Dak.
AC has been very clear about wanting Dak to take a pay cut. During Dak's current contract negotiations, AC didn't want him to break the bank either...and AC is about the biggest Dak fan on this board.
it says possible and sure i think thats a little overboard even for this FO trying to find another QB...but is it possible we go through several QB's before we find one that can play as well as Dak..yeah it is. The OP is making it seem like only one side has big hyperbole going when clearly both sides can greatly bend logic trying to make a point for their side.
Bull
so your saying that it isnt possible for THIS FO to have problems finding a QB that plays as well as Dak....is 10 to 15 years unlikley sure..but should we go back through the QB's this GM has wanted to draft over the last 15 years?
Ill agree with you on the second half of that statement, this is not a one sided issue. The extremes on both sides are to blame and basically use the same tactics to attack each other.
Roger was immediately replaced by Danny White ........ Danny White was gone one year when they drafted Troy .......after Troy they got Romo in free agency 3 years later ....... Romo was still starting when they got Dak
and this argument could work if he didnt have 8 seasons (yeah i get injuries shorten it but not to 1 year) of COMP% to go off of..is he the only QB in history that gets lucky that long that his comp% is one of the best in the league for well over 5 years? come on man..he fails in the playoffs with the rest of the team..thats a fact, the rest of this is just not a fact.
It’s not about Dak though it’s more so lacking faith this front office can find another guy when they’ve failed nearly every time. If McClay was making the decision I’d have a little comfort. But if it’s the guy that wanted Paxton Lynch and Johnny Football? Or the one who let Clint Stoerner, Quincy Carter and Ryan Leaf start for him? A little less comforting.
So one person makes a post about it and that speaks for all pro Dak guys?
Exactly.
Rockport speaks for himself not the whole Dak pro crowd.
I'm all with you on lacking faith in the front office, just for different reasons. I also agree that this really isn't a Dak issue at the core, but that's why I'm OK with moving on too.
ok so this FO went after Romo or got lucky? this FO wanted Dak or once again got lucky when not even wanting him..the 3 they wanted before him are not in the NFL now..again he isnt saying its a givin he said its possible..is he overboard with the 10 to 15 years..sure, but its very possible this GM picks several QB's that dont work out..
Well I would argue that the pro Dak crowd that is truly an issue are the few people on the extreme end of the spectrum. I think that's also true for the Anti Dak crowd as well. 90% of fans I think are more aligned on the subject than they realize.
Who has attacked Dak on a personal level? The anti-Dak crowd, and I have no problem admitting I am one of them, doesn't like his performance on the field. Period. As far as I have seen, NO ONE attacks him personally, except for his perceived level of greed.
Not true. Rockport started that exact thread.
i agree and whats wrong with the facts..pro Dak has been a very good QB for most regular season games, con Dak has had very bad failures in the playoffs..neither of those are soley a Dak good or bad as the team has done the same for 28 years. Nothing wrong with the facts people that want to move on i get why, people that say Dak isnt the problem i get that also...people saying the other useless dribble that go against facts are just putting mud in the water.
