Dak: I'm about to have my best year

big dog cowboy said:
As usual, you are wrong again.

If you think it's just one, you are more delusional than I thought.
Click to expand...
You're delusional because you want it to be you, but once again you're not that important to call someone a name, I'll keep my names about you in my jar!!


You get joy in saying people don't like me on here, for every person in your orbit that doesn't, there's someone that does, and it makes you so jealous lol. Not like I hear anyone raving about you!!
 
Jstopper said:
Clearly understanding football at a high level is not a condition of being a moderator. If you want to pretend Dak didn’t have a very impressive season this year you can have at it. lol Jesus some of yall are hilarious on this board.
Click to expand...
That was a bizarre comment from him. A few game mean his whole season wasn’t good. I don’t know what’s going on on this site.
 
I just hope he has his best playoff year ........ because that is where he falls apart.

He is a very good regular season QB ......... I just do not expect him to take the next step or improve in the playoffs at year 10.

Hopefully he proves me and a lot of other people wrong.
 
Coogiguy03 said:
You're delusional because you want it to be you, but once again you're not that important to call someone a name, I'll keep my names about you in my jar!!


You get joy in saying people don't like me on here, for every person in your orbit that doesn't, there's someone that does, and it makes you so jealous lol. Not like I hear anyone raving about you!!
Click to expand...
:muttley:
 
Jstopper said:
Clearly understanding football at a high level is not a condition of being a moderator. If you want to pretend Dak didn’t have a very impressive season this year you can have at it. lol Jesus some of yall are hilarious on this board.
Click to expand...
He played pretty good. I did take some pause about TOP, red zone scoring, and excessive FGs.

Another concern I had is a bit more..ambiguous. Probably more interesting (to me) than any kind of factual assessment.

In the last game Joe and Dak played equal amounts of time. Almost the same attempts, completions and yards. Dak had a lost fumble Joe had two ints- close to a wash (as far as JUST the turnover stat- not the consequences). Joe did tack on the 50 yards rushing on 5 carries as well as a TD pass.

In this very small sample...the two QB's performed equally...perhaps a slight edge to Joe for TD pass and 50 ground yards. I get that some (many?) will dismiss these stats as "meaningless" given the circumstances. But I think it COULD be trying to tell us something.

"Ridiculous"? hmmm...maybe! Willing to bet we'll never find out. Not if Dak stays healthy.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
He played pretty good. I did take some pause about TOP, red zone scoring, and excessive FGs.

Another concern I had is a bit more..ambiguous. Probably more interesting (to me) than any kind of factual assessment.

In the last game Joe and Dak played equal amounts of time. Almost the same attempts, completions and yards. Dak had a lost fumble Joe had two ints- close to a wash (as far as JUST the turnover stat- not the consequences). Joe did tack on the 50 yards rushing on 5 carries as well as a TD pass.

In this very small sample...the two QB's performed equally...perhaps a slight edge to Joe for TD pass and 50 ground yards. I get that some (many?) will dismiss these stats as "meaningless" given the circumstances. But I think it COULD be trying to tell us something.

"Ridiculous"? hmmm...maybe! Willing to bet we'll never find out. Not if Dak stays healthy.
Click to expand...
You're just a "hater" and probably don't have a dak jersey, so find another team, "hater."
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
He played pretty good. I did take some pause about TOP, red zone scoring, and excessive FGs.

Another concern I had is a bit more..ambiguous. Probably more interesting (to me) than any kind of factual assessment.

In the last game Joe and Dak played equal amounts of time. Almost the same attempts, completions and yards. Dak had a lost fumble Joe had two ints- close to a wash (as far as JUST the turnover stat- not the consequences). Joe did tack on the 50 yards rushing on 5 carries as well as a TD pass.

In this very small sample...the two QB's performed equally...perhaps a slight edge to Joe for TD pass and 50 ground yards. I get that some (many?) will dismiss these stats as "meaningless" given the circumstances. But I think it COULD be trying to tell us something.

"Ridiculous"? hmmm...maybe! Willing to bet we'll never find out. Not if Dak stays healthy.
Click to expand...
lol I’m not even gonna dignify a conversation comparing Joe and Dak
 
Jstopper said:
lol I’m not even gonna dignify a conversation comparing Joe and Dak
Click to expand...
And yet you just did.

I thought I caveated the SHIP out of my comment...but...if someone is unwilling to even CONSIDER talking about it....well...I'd rather you not dignify it either. So at the very least we agree on THAT.

Instead of saying "steve...my lad...here's why that's an unforced error on your part"...you just cancel it out not speak of it.

Good job...you convinced me.

Edit: The fun part is I KNEW...someone like you would insanely object..comment about how it's stupid and not say why. Have to admity I underestimated you a tad.

"I get that some (many?) will dismiss these stats as "meaningless" given the circumstances". You went WAY beyond "meaningless". So that says a LOT my man. A lot.
 
Even if it wasn't true, what else is he supposed to say?

The people that complain about Dak all the time have some serious personal issues going on.
 
SteveTheCowboy said:
And yet you just did.

I thought I caveated the SHIP out of my comment...but...if someone is unwilling to even CONSIDER talking about it....well...I'd rather you not dignify it either. So at the very least we agree on THAT.

Instead of saying "steve...my lad...here's why that's an unforced error on your part"...you just cancel it out not speak of it.

Good job...you convinced me.

Edit: The fun part is I KNEW...someone like you would insanely object..comment about how it's stupid and not say why. Have to admity I underestimated you a tad.

"I get that some (many?) will dismiss these stats as "meaningless" given the circumstances". You went WAY beyond "meaningless". So that says a LOT my man. A lot.
Click to expand...
But then they accuse you of arrogance. The presumption of a superior argument that can't be bothered with reasoned persuasion. Just indignant disbelief that they have to prove their point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 45 more.
Total: 12,387 (members: 145, guests: 12,242)
Robots: 1,224

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,566
Messages
14,545,874
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top