Twitter: DraftKings Top 5 Offenses

TexasHillbilly said:
I hope so. Everyone seems so high on this guy. I hope he turns it on this season.
Click to expand...
I am not high on him for the fact that Dallas does not use a 2 RB system. Same thing they do with the TE position.

You could have 3 All Pro TE's on the roster and two would sit and only be used to block.
 
GMO415 said:
Ok, then after 10 years and $60 million annually, with all the offensive talent that amounts to 61% of the team's salary cap, Dak should make the NFC Championship game. If not, he's a failure.

There is no more excuses. You can't be talent rich and go 7-10 again.
Click to expand...
Im sure his brain dead fans will come up with an excuse
 
J12B said:


I'd say we're 2nd for sure.

Prescott > Goff
Gibbs > Williams
Lamb > St. Brown
Pickens > Williams
La Porta > Feguson

Could even make the argument for 1st, but I won't.
Click to expand...

Jared Goff has seen more playoff success in one year than Dak has enjoyed his entire career.

Facts > Feelings
 
DandyDon52 said:
I think your wrong about who is driving lol.
The HC is the one who is driving, and the jones boys play a big part too.
I am not a dak fan, but look at the HC and OC's he has had, garrett then MM lol
And never a good OC, dallas has had a predictable offense for a long time till shotty took over.

Hard to win when your playbook is stale with no innovation.
Click to expand...
Ah, yes. Driving seat is a thing of your perspective. For me it is the QB who drives the team on the field. But of course HC, OC and even the GM has influence.

But you are wrong about his OCs. There were a lot more. then only Garrett and MM. And Garrett never was the OC/playcaller during Daks time here.
All of them were cut with reasoning that their gameplan, gamecalls or playbock were to easy and predictable.

before Dak: Callahan (playcalling under Garrett as HC). Just to show that Garrett wasnt a playcaller/OC for a long time here. Even under Romo.

since Dak:
1. Linehan (playcalling under Garrett as HC), was fine and well respect around the league during his Romo time. But suddenly somehow sucked and not able to call complex plays with Dak.
2. Moore (playcalling under Garrett as HC) -> same as with Linehan
3. Mike McCarthy (playcalling by himself) -> SB winning coach with Rodgers, somehow forget how to call plays when paired with Dak and he seemed to also lost his complex playbook he wrote and used during his GB times. How else do you explain that he wasnt able to call complex plays when he was in Dallas ?
4. Brian Schottenheimer (under MM as HC) -> well McCarthy had to go, why ? Offense wasnt better with Brians calls.
5. Brian Schottenheimer (as OC and HC)


It was not like those OCs werent able to AND havent had way more complex playbooks. The problem is the guy who had to execute the plays. And it was always the same when a new OC came here: First he tried to implement a more complex playbook. Then after weeks of trying he saw with this guy i have to trim it down. Everybody then started to shout about its simplicity. But that had a reason: The guy at QB wasnt able to execute those complex plays.

Again: We got rid of way too many OCs and it was always the same process during every ones stint with us. That points more to an underlying problem and not one associated with those OCs. And the problem is the QB we are sporting. He is flat out bad. You are so limited with him and what you can let him do.
 
Last edited:
Tangle_Foot said:
I'll take it, I won't quibble, you need look no further than our right tackle issues. If that were to resolve itself, I have no doubt we could be the number one offense ;)
Click to expand...
All we need to do is trail by more earlier in games. The offense will light up the prevent.
 
TwentyOne said:
Ah, yes. Driving seat is a thing of your perspective. For me it is the QB who drives the team on the field. But of course HC, OC and even the GM has influence.

But you are wrong about his OCs. There were a lot more. then only Garrett and MM. And Garrett never was the OC/playcaller during Daks time here.
All of them were cut with reasoning that their gameplan, gamecalls or playbock were to easy and predictable.

before Dak: Callahan (playcalling under Garrett as HC). Just to show that Garrett wasnt a playcaller/OC for a long time here. Even under Romo.

since Dak:
1. Linehan (playcalling under Garrett as HC), was fine and well respect around the league during his Romo time. But suddenly somehow sucked and not able to call complex plays with Dak.
2. Moore (playcalling under Garrett as HC) -> same as with Linehan
3. Mike McCarthy (playcalling by himself) -> SB winning coach with Rodgers, somehow forget how to call plays when paired with Dak and he seemed to also lost his complex playbook he wrote and used during his GB times. How else do you explain that he wasnt able to call complex plays when he was in Dallas ?
4. Brian Schottenheimer (under MM as HC) -> well McCarthy had to go, why ? Offense wasnt better with Brians calls.
5. Brian Schottenheimer (as OC and HC)


It was not like those OCs werent able to AND havent had way more complex playbooks. The problem is the guy who had to execute the plays. And it was always the same when a new OC came here: First he tried to implement a more complex playbook. Then after weeks of trying he saw with this guy i have to trim it down. Everybody then started to shout about its simplicity. But that had a reason: The guy at QB wasnt able to execute those complex plays.

Again: We got rid of way too many OCs and it was always the same process during every ones stint with us. That points more to an underlying problem and not one associated with those OCs. And the problem is the QB we are sporting. He is flat out bad. You are so limited with him and what you can let him do.
Click to expand...
Probably a bit harsh but there is merit to what you say.
 
Reid1boys said:
We had a top 5 defense that created bedlam a few short years ago. How did that work out?
Click to expand...
That top 5 defense was a mirage. Loaded up stats against bad teams but any offense with a pulse could easily beat that defense. They were any thing but a top 5 defense when it mattered most.

A legit top 5 defense is what Seattle had last year. Rams in 2021. Baltimore 2000, Tampa 2002, Seattle 2013, Denver 2015. Those defenses show up when it matters most and can take pressure off the offense.

I can't remember a defense Dallas took to the playoffs who helped out Dallas if the offense had an off day.
 
Chasing6 said:
I am not high on him for the fact that Dallas does not use a 2 RB system. Same thing they do with the TE position.

You could have 3 All Pro TE's on the roster and two would sit and only be used to block.
Click to expand...
They definitely limit themselves for no apparent reason.
 
Blackspider214 said:
That top 5 defense was a mirage. Loaded up stats against bad teams but any offense with a pulse could easily beat that defense. They were any thing but a top 5 defense when it mattered most.

A legit top 5 defense is what Seattle had last year. Rams in 2021. Baltimore 2000, Tampa 2002, Seattle 2013, Denver 2015. Those defenses show up when it matters most and can take pressure off the offense.

I can't remember a defense Dallas took to the playoffs who helped out Dallas if the offense had an off day.
Click to expand...
Mostly true. But the D did pretty well against the 9ers
 
DarkVader33 said:
Only brain dead people didn’t notice the historically bad defense. One of the worst ever. You can probably go on YouTube and watch. Be warned that it will be painful.
Click to expand...
Show me the people who you are talking about. Who defended last year's defense?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 113 more.
Total: 13,710 (members: 213, guests: 13,497)
Robots: 1,335

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,560
Messages
14,545,653
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top