Classless Redsk*n move

I always put the asterisk in their name as a reminder that their Superbowls come with an asterisk because of the strike-shortened seasons. I think it's become a habit for a few of us, but I can't speak for anybody else's reasoning.

EDIT, looks like the joke was institutionalized. :)
 
I sit at a bar most Sundays and talk to a Piscataway Indian wearing some type of Washington Commanders shirt... I'm pretty sure he's not offended.
Also shoot pool twice a week with a Cherokee Indian who loves his Commanders football.... so I call BS on the offensive word stuff.
 
If Native American's say there's something wrong with the word, then there's something wrong with it.

Even aside from that, it's fun to give them a hard time about it.


Poll: Majority OK with 'Commanders'

WASHINGTON -- It's been a rough offseason for the Washington Commanders, and not just because of the knee injury to star quarterback Robert Griffin III.
The team's nickname has faced a new barrage of criticism for being offensive to Native Americans. Local leaders and pundits have called for a name change. Opponents have launched a legal challenge intended to deny the team federal trademark protection. A bill introduced in Congress in March would do the same, though it appears unlikely to pass.

But a new Associated Press-GfK poll shows that nationally, "Commanders" still enjoys widespread support. Nearly four in five Americans don't think the team should change its name, the survey found. Only 11 percent think it should be changed, while 8 percent weren't sure and 2 percent didn't answer.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/9235381/poll-majority-approve-washington-Commanders-name
 
This thread isn't about the Sk*ns' name. It's about their lack of class when it comes to the history of the rivalry. The *'s are to question the validity of your past Superbowls, two of which are tarnished for obvious reasons.

Nobody cares about your racist name being racist.
 
If Native American's say there's something wrong with the word, then there's something wrong with it.

Even aside from that, it's fun to give them a hard time about it.
Exactly!

Same as if they called the Cowboys, Cowg irls or something along those lines.
 
Line 1 in telling a joke is to let everyone else in on the punch line...... maybe the * is in the wrong place.... 'cause it sure looks like censorship to me and most everyone else here...
Just sayin'.
 
The name Redsk*ns was never considered racist until all this PC bull**** now. Redsk*n was actually considered honorable and brave. But you know the media.

This couldn't be more wrong. Regardless of the word's origin, it has been considered a racist and derogatory term since the 1960's. Before then it was becoming more and more derogatory starting as far back as 1875, as literary studies of the word have shown. By the time it was chosen for the team name it was certainly viewed by many as a negative term and let's not forget that the man that chose the name was a known and unashamed racist who refused to sign black players until the league forced him to and who set up a foundation with explicit rules that no funds ever be put towards anything or anyone that didn't believe in segregation. I don't think it's a coincidence that that man chose an increasingly negative name for Native Americans. To me, it doesn't matter what a word meant 100's of years ago. It matters what it means now and the term is now soo widely viewed as racists that it hasn't been used in everyday conversations in nearly 50 years and every dictionary that chooses to define it proclaims it to be racist and derogatory. Why would anyone want to be associated with a word that has become racist?
 
If Native American's say there's something wrong with the word, then there's something wrong with it.

My apologies. This was the article I meant to post that actually polled American Indians. There is a more recent one with similar results, but I can't find it at the moment. This one is from 2004:


Most Indians Say Name of Washington “Commanders” Is Acceptable While 9 Percent Call It Offensive

Most American Indians say that calling Washington’s professional football team the “Commanders” does not bother them, the University of Pennsylvania’s National Annenberg Election Survey shows.
Ninety percent of Indians took that position, while 9 percent said they found the name “offensive.” One percent had no answer. The margin of sampling error for those findings was plus or minus two percentage points.

http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycen...acceptable-while-9-percent-call-it-offensive/
 
I sit at a bar most Sundays and talk to a Piscataway Indian wearing some type of Washington Redsk*ns shirt... I'm pretty sure he's not offended.
Also shoot pool twice a week with a Cherokee Indian who loves his Redsk*ns football.... so I call BS on the offensive word stuff.

Come on dude, that is only two people you have interacted with and they don't speak for all Natives Americans. If majority of Native Americans feels that word is offensive than it is, if not then it isn't.
 
The name Redsk*ns was never considered racist until all this PC bull**** now. Redsk*n was actually considered honorable and brave. But you know the media.

Amen. I get sick of the PC race card BS. There are enough reasons to hate them without going with the PC stuff.
 
It's ok to respectfully talk about the issue revolving around the use of the Commanders being racist since its a national issue. Let's leave it at that though or the thread will be closed. Fair enough?
 
It's ok to respectfully talk about the issue revolving around the use of the Redsk*ns being racist since its a national issue. Let's leave it at that though or the thread will be closed. Fair enough?

I would like an apology from your staff member, Idgit.
 
Man, you guys are fuddy duddys. It's Commander week and y'all are getting all PC. Can't have fun with NOBODY nowadays.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,633
Messages
13,823,358
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top