We have a ton of money tied to our starting QB who also happens to be a terrific player.
On top of that, we have far greater needs elsewhere that must be addressed if we want any chance at making noise in the immediate future.
What part of that is difficult to understand? It's not rocket science.
Sturm doesn't sound pleased.
Questioning coziness of Cowboys FO with Romo.
Sturm doesn't sound pleased.
Questioning coziness of Cowboys FO with Romo.
The central theme of Sturms complaint was that he liked Sua-Filo better and there were safeties on the board. He was judging based in large part because of his personal player evaluation. I have a hard time taking his criticism seriously compared to the consensus in how the guards were ranked.
I am glad they didn't take him, but why do they not stick to the board?
I am glad they didn't take him, but why do they not stick to the board?
Is that from earlier today. They were just talking about this a couple of minutes ago? Basically, he was questioning whether their personal relationship with Romo is interfering with their ability to do what's right for the team. WE can debate whether that's right or not, but that's was the gist of what he was saying.
35 years ago, we passed on a quarterback b/c we thought we were well situated at the position. That qb was Joe Montana.
35 years ago, we passed on a quarterback b/c we thought we were well situated at the position. That qb was Joe Montana.
Boards are fluid. There is no rule that says you can't make last millisecond changes. And who knows, they may have put Manziel on the board as a diversion in case someone outside the club took a peak. Or just to please Jerry Jones. "Okay Mr. Jones, we have made Manziel the top player on the board. Now just sit here and sip on your juice and vodka."