49ers 5 point favorites. Witten, Romo, Dez have to lead!

Leave it to the Zone to focus on play calling duties instead of the Xs and Os for the game coming up.
I guess you could say:
GUILTY

I tend to focus on what catches my eye when they happen to come into focus.
Serendipity at it's finest...
 
Without Smith and Bowman, I think we can score on them.

I agree. Those are two huge blows to that team. I'm not so sure this is the same 49ers team that's been on top end of the league the past few season.
 
I think Twill and the 2nd TE(Hanna or Escobar) will have to bring their A game. As usual, they will double Dez and Witten most of the game and dare the others to beat them.
 
Leave it to the Zone to focus on play calling duties instead of the Xs and Os for the game coming up.

X's and O's wold mean they have to know something about football.

Besides, beating the play calling drum is like an addict getting another fix.
 
X's and O's wold mean they have to know something about football.

Besides, beating the play calling drum is like an addict getting another fix.

I believe my stance is the most correct one on play calling and my involvement was to state Garrett was willing to find a play caller since his 2nd year.
BUT...
Hank-Hill-Mows-The-Lawn-To-Get-His-Drug-Fix-On-King-Of-The-Hill.jpg
 
I believe my stance is the most correct one on play calling and my involvement was to state Garrett was willing to find a play caller since his 2nd year.
BUT...
Hank-Hill-Mows-The-Lawn-To-Get-His-Drug-Fix-On-King-Of-The-Hill.jpg

Anyone that listens and pays attention w/o filtering everything thru the mediot created narrative perspective about Red & Jerry knows that Red has spoken numerous times about the play calling and his desire to have someone else do it. He even has gone so far as to say he wanted to give it up but the GM wanted him to keep it. It was obvious when he said "we" when talking about him as the playcaller that the "we" was him and the Blue Label Drinker.

So, yes, you would be considered one of the few around here that actually listens and pays attention while thinking for yourself.
 
Anyone that listens and pays attention w/o filtering everything thru the mediot created narrative perspective about Red & Jerry knows that Red has spoken numerous times about the play calling and his desire to have someone else do it. He even has gone so far as to say he wanted to give it up but the GM wanted him to keep it. It was obvious when he said "we" when talking about him as the playcaller that the "we" was him and the Blue Label Drinker.

So, yes, you would be considered one of the few around here that actually listens and pays attention while thinking for yourself.

Hey- I feel like Johnny Appleseed with how many times I've spread the link (which I did again in this very thread) which quotes Garrett basically saying- of course I would like to have a play caller here so I can focus my efforts more broadly.
Back in January of 2012.
I guess nobody ever clicks it.
 
Hey- I feel like Johnny Appleseed with how many times I've spread the link (which I did again in this very thread) which quotes Garrett basically saying- of course I would like to have a play caller here so I can focus my efforts more broadly.
Back in January of 2012.
I guess nobody ever clicks it.

Well, that would let the air out of the balloon. And it would take away one of the favorite whipping boy topics. Then they would have less to complain about as it relates to Red. It would mean an adjustment in how they perceive the entire Process and its too hard to accept that one has been wrong for 3 1/2 yrs into the Process.

quote-Sir-John-Lubbock-what-we-see-depends-mainly-on-what-1-106070.png


see-043.jpg
 
I think we'll lose this game. I can't predict how much, give me 2 or 3 games under my belt and I'll have a better idea. I just didn't like the offense in the preseason, nor the defense. Nothing's really changed as usual.
 
You didn't add that up correctly, lol

Edit...

I guess you meant on neutral field... Makes sense.. But not many neutral field gms in the nfl

11 point favs in Sf... Thats a ton

Aye, on a neutral field it would be SF -8, subtract 3 due to Dallas being at home = SF -5 :)

Being the first week where no one really knows whats going to happen, that is a lot of points to cover on the road for a team that has lost some players. Not to mention, Dallas usually plays them well and I expect SF to struggle this season, especially early on. I am not convinced Kaeprnickel can carry a team that is missing key defensive players.

I don't bet on Cowboys games but if I did, I would be all over Dallas +5, easy money IMO. The public should notice this and I would not be surprised to see the line move a point or two in SF's favor then I would stay away from it. Lock the 5 in early gamblers!
 
Niners can stop the run and force us to beat their Secondary,i am not very confident in this offense at all.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,614
Messages
13,822,170
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top