Jerry Jones accused of sexual assault

kimrose

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,502
Reaction score
3,591
I am just curious about something, I do not know, haven't seen anything definitive. But in the photos, there is only one girl in each photo, meaning is it possible that they were taking pics of each other? One girl takes the pic, then switches places and the other girl takes the next pic? If it was indeed an entirely separate girl, where are the pics of Uncle Jerry with both of the girls together?? Surely there would have been a few of those, right...?? Is there a picture of the girl who is filing the lawsuit? Or do they really know for a fact that the girl filing is not in any of the pics? That wasn't very clear to me one way or the other when reading the article. Would love clarification if anyone has read or has proof that I have not seen. Thanks.
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
Regardless if the alleged victim is making this up or not there is no doubt in my mind what JJ was doing that night. Even if she is just looking for money, which I believe she is, it doesn't make what JJ did acceptable.

Based on the pictures it's pretty clear they weren't "misrepresentative" of anything. In matter of fact they show JJ for exactly what he is, an embarrassment to the Cowboys as an owner and GM, a disgrace to the NFL and a horrible husband.

Reading thorough this thread it boggles my mind how many people not necessarily jump to his defense but more less excuse his actions and automatically call out the "victim" for just looking for money. Again, I agree she is looking for money but let's not overlook the fact that JJ should be held accountable for his actions and held to a higher standard considering his position.

I wish his wife would divorce him and take him for everything he's worth.
 
Last edited:

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
What married man and representative of an NFL franchise should be in a *****'s closet in the first place?

None. But there's a big difference between assault and philandering.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,505
Reaction score
6,106
The whole episode speaks more to his stupidity than his lechery.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Yup, find comfort in making that distinction without meaning about the guy you support unabashidly.

You're fishing with no bait, Dooms. Not only are you wrong on my take on Jerry overall, and about my take on his philandering in particular, but you also somehow--and I find this really interesting that you could twist your own reasoning so significantly--make the mistake of equating cheating on a spouse with sexual assault. There's no definition of those two actions where the distinction is meaningless.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,505
Reaction score
6,106
You're fishing with no bait, Dooms. Not only are you wrong on my take on Jerry overall, and about my take on his philandering in particular, but you also somehow--and I find this really interesting that you could twist your own reasoning so significantly--make the mistake of equating cheating on a spouse with sexual assault. There's no definition of those two actions where the distinction is meaningless.

It's meaningless to distinguish between the acts because both are reprehensible. Procedure 101.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's meaningless to distinguish between the acts because both are reprehensible. Procedure 101.

That makes no sense. Both acts are reprehensible. That doesn't make them equivalent. If they're not equivalent, distinguishing between them is meaningful.
 

BoysFan4ever

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,593
Reaction score
3,510
I am just curious about something, I do not know, haven't seen anything definitive. But in the photos, there is only one girl in each photo, meaning is it possible that they were taking pics of each other? One girl takes the pic, then switches places and the other girl takes the next pic? If it was indeed an entirely separate girl, where are the pics of Uncle Jerry with both of the girls together?? Surely there would have been a few of those, right...?? Is there a picture of the girl who is filing the lawsuit? Or do they really know for a fact that the girl filing is not in any of the pics? That wasn't very clear to me one way or the other when reading the article. Would love clarification if anyone has read or has proof that I have not seen. Thanks.

The only 2 pics I have seen are the 2 that have been published in many places. The blonde getting groped & a brunette kneeling. Some things you cannot unsee...

Jerry looks totally wasted in both.
 

PA Cowboy Fan

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,584
Reaction score
49,793
Regardless if the alleged victim is making this up or not there is no doubt in my mind what JJ was doing that night. Even if she is just looking for money, which I believe she is, it doesn't make what JJ did acceptable.

Based on the pictures it's pretty clear they weren't "misrepresentative" of anything. In matter of fact they show JJ for exactly what he is, an embarrassment to the Cowboys as an owner and GM, a disgrace to the NFL and a horrible husband.

Reading thorough this thread it boggles my mind how many people not necessarily jump to his defense but more less excuse his actions and automatically call out the "victim" for just looking for money. Again, I agree she is looking for money but let's not overlook the fact that JJ should be held accountable for his actions and held to a higher standard considering his position.

I wish his wife would divorce him and take him for everything he's worth.

I agree. Like I said I don't care one way or another. Jerry put himself in this situation. It makes no difference to me if he did it or not. I'm not feeling sorry for him. He wants to be a tabloid owner then that's what he got.
 

tantrix1969

Well-Known Member
Messages
963
Reaction score
450
I am just curious about something, I do not know, haven't seen anything definitive. But in the photos, there is only one girl in each photo, meaning is it possible that they were taking pics of each other? One girl takes the pic, then switches places and the other girl takes the next pic? If it was indeed an entirely separate girl, where are the pics of Uncle Jerry with both of the girls together?? Surely there would have been a few of those, right...?? Is there a picture of the girl who is filing the lawsuit? Or do they really know for a fact that the girl filing is not in any of the pics? That wasn't very clear to me one way or the other when reading the article. Would love clarification if anyone has read or has proof that I have not seen. Thanks.

There were definitely 3 girls.
Here are 2 in the pics http://www.tmz.com/2014/08/08/jerry-jones-photos-twitter-women-hire-attorney/
Here is the girl suing Jerry http://www.mstarz.com/articles/3666...-sues-nfl-dallas-cowboys-owner-harassment.htm
 

kimrose

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,502
Reaction score
3,591
The only 2 pics I have seen are the 2 that have been published in many places. The blonde getting groped & a brunette kneeling. Some things you cannot unsee...

Jerry looks totally wasted in both.

Yes, he does. The blonde looks like she is x-ing big time. Or would that be called "mollying" today??
 

kimrose

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,502
Reaction score
3,591

Thanks a lot, Tantrix. Yeah, the filer could look like the brunette, but in the pic the girl has brown eyes, and the trashy looking filer has blue. Hadn't seen that pic of the filer, and kind of wish I hadn't of. lol. Yuck. That girl doesn't have a leg to stand on. For sure a money grubber.
 
Top