All you Romo haters never speak again

lostar2009

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,872
Reaction score
3,487
That's what people are referencing here when they say it

It was long ago there huge debates on this board about Romo. Some posters was calling big time Romo supporters stans. It may have resurface lately to a new meaning but it had it origins among debates.
 

Hoov

Senior Member
Messages
6,024
Reaction score
1,183
That's what people are referencing here when they say it

No. It was like 2 years ago. The recent one was done on purpose.

I remember seeing someone post "romo Stan's not romo stats " stated before in arguments when people posted stats about romo
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
As many have posted, we are a 4-5 win team with out Romo. With him we add another 5-6 wins. Too bad most of Romo's youth was wasted by Jerry and his HORRIBLE offensive lines and WRs. Roy Williams, really???:facepalm:

Come on now.

Owens was a fantastic receiver that Tony got to play with right out of the gates in his career.

He had Terry Glenn early on who was a darn good receiver and I still don't care what anyone says Patrick Crayton was a nice secondary receiver option when he was here for Romo.

He had Miles Austin during Miles brief stint as a real playmaker and he's now got Dez. Romo has always had at least a start #1 WR.

The only thing the offense lacked the majority of the time was a real O-line and a commitment to a running game. Which he now has.
 
Top