Discussion in 'Overtime Zone' started by GiveDezdaBall88, Nov 3, 2014.
It came from a thread where the poster misspelled fans with stans called We are all Weeden stans
Healthiest approach right there.
No that was way before then. I know what your talking about it.
That's what people are referencing here when they say it
It was long ago there huge debates on this board about Romo. Some posters was calling big time Romo supporters stans. It may have resurface lately to a new meaning but it had it origins among debates.
Those huge debates use to spread for weeks. Why do you think there is a rant zone now ?
No. It was like 2 years ago. The recent one was done on purpose.
I remember seeing someone post "romo Stan's not romo stats " stated before in arguments when people posted stats about romo
Oh ok. I was the one that completely missed the reference then
Come on now.
Owens was a fantastic receiver that Tony got to play with right out of the gates in his career.
He had Terry Glenn early on who was a darn good receiver and I still don't care what anyone says Patrick Crayton was a nice secondary receiver option when he was here for Romo.
He had Miles Austin during Miles brief stint as a real playmaker and he's now got Dez. Romo has always had at least a start #1 WR.
The only thing the offense lacked the majority of the time was a real O-line and a commitment to a running game. Which he now has.