Dallas Running Back Plan

This reeks of the get by mentality along the OL before the Cowboys got serious.

The QB doesn't have a lot of time left. The team can win now. Its not the time to experiment at RB with marginal prospects and an Oakland flop.

I agree somewhat but I wouldn't feel so hopeless like it seems you will with our current group of RBs.


The Patriots won the Super Bowl with 6 different RBs and I believe our stable of current backs are much better then theirs.
 
I agree somewhat but I wouldn't feel so hopeless like it seems you will with our current group of RBs.


The Patriots won the Super Bowl with 6 different RBs and I believe our stable of current backs are much better then theirs.

Their D was also a lot better then ours was. We would need a similiar D performance or close to it.
 
It's one thing to share your personal hopes and dreams because you want to see a name in the first round that you recognize, but what do you really think the RB plan is for 2015?

Personally, I don't see any way we draft Gurley or Gordon in round 1. We fans may not believe in McFadden, Randal, and Dunbar, but we signed one, and neither of the other two were released with all the RB options out there, despite also signing Ryan Williams.

I think the Cowboys are serious about seeing what McFadden can do behind our OL.
I think the Cowboys are serious about seeing what Ryan Williams can do behind this line and away from the scout team.
I believe the Cowboys believe in what they've seen from Randal in limited duty.
I believe the Cowboys know what they have in Dunbar and may be committed to seeing him more on 3rd downs.

Demarco Murray was the 71st selection in his draft, third round, and that wasn't even a deep draft for RBs. I don't believe for a second that the Cowboys think Gurley's or Gordon's upside is that much higher than any one of 6 or more other RBs in the draft to warrant selecting a RB so high.

The Cowboys are very likely to see a number of DTs that can step into the rotation right away at #27 and really solidify that position group. They are likely to see at least 2-3 worthy CBs who might step in and start the season as our 3rd best corner on the field. There's a chance they may see the top FS prospect there or another worthy DE, and I feel very confident that they will see a top notch LB available at #27.

Those are all positions of much greater need that, in later rounds, also need more development than a RB. The Cowboys can add a fifth RB to their stable, one with great upside, on the 2nd and even 3rd day. I, for one, don't believe that Gurley or Gordon stand to have a much more successful pro career, much less rookie season, than Duke Johnson or Jay Ajayi or even lesser prospects like Buck Allen of USC.

Who was the last RB at Wisconsin who didn't have a great career in college? Who was the last one to translate big to the NFL? Who was the last RB to struggle in Georgia's run game? Who was the last one to make it big in the NFL? We could ask those questions about most RB's. There isn't a sure thing. I won't be surprised if Duke Johnson ends up having a better career in the NFL than any back in this draft.

Strengthen the defensive with a CB, LB, or DL in round 1....almost all mocks have quality players available at 27. Find another RB and another WR on another day. I think once again, Jerry will listen to Stephen and McClay, and I find it hard to imagine either of them telling him to take any RB in round 1.

I'm not sure if the Cowboys will go RB in the first round, but I wouldn't be surprised. The Cowboys are taking a serious look at what is perceived to be the top 5 RB's in the draft and over the last several years of drafting, the player they took in the 1st typically had been in for a visit prior to the draft. On that, you can draw your own conclusions.

However, what I feel very certain about is the 1st round pick will not be used on a DT. They aren't looking at the top tier DT to my knowledge, and that speak's volume. In my mind, the Cowboys board is leaning towards RB or Corner and if all their potential favorites within those positions are taken, I could see them trading out of the 1st round. Just my own prediction.
 
I'm not sure if the Cowboys will go RB in the first round, but I wouldn't be surprised. The Cowboys are taking a serious look at what is perceived to be the top 5 RB's in the draft and over the last several years of drafting, the player they took in the 1st typically had been in for a visit prior to the draft. On that, you can draw your own conclusions.

However, what I feel very certain about is the 1st round pick will not be used on a DT. They aren't looking at the top tier DT to my knowledge, and that speak's volume. In my mind, the Cowboys board is leaning towards RB or Corner and if all their potential favorites within those positions are taken, I could see them trading out of the 1st round. Just my own prediction.

I can see that. to me they would have three priorities:
1) If they can get a Top CB one way or another
2) another Pass rusher that they think can come right in and get sacks his first season
3) top RB which is the one position in the NFL that you can reasonably expect high production in a rookie year
 
Uhmm not certain what Dallas is going to do at RB but I am sure it's going to be a lot different than just McFadden, Williams, Dunbar... and Randall needs to hit the road jack.
 
Thanks.

Better. McFadden is even better in pass pro than Murray.

Well he's a better home run threat I can give u that.. Anything else and we can start what if.. I'm optimistic though he has quick wheels when healthy...
 
Their D was also a lot better then ours was. We would need a similiar D performance or close to it.

I'm just not worried about our run game even at its current state.

We will run the ball and run it well whether it's Mcfadden, Randle, Williams, or a draft pick.
 
There is no question in my mind that the depth of this year's RB class didn't play a part in the hard-line approach to Murray.

I fully expect a high round RB draft pick. Although if we panic and trade up for one I will be less than happy with it.
 
#27 might be anyone from the RB, CB, DE or DT positions, depending on which top priority target is available.
 
Last edited:
I think we will draft a RB early,we are not bringing in all these RBs to interview as a smoke screen.

This. Absolutely

We'd be nuts to ignore the depth of the RB class when it aligns perfectly with a position that is at best suspect.

It'll happen sometime between Rounds 1 and 5, and as long as as they get one they like I'm fine whenever they pick him
 
Gag me with a spoon.

If they trade up for a RB, it had better be Gurley. Even that though, I wouldn't be happy with unless it was incredibly good value. Say something like a 5th or next years 4th to jump up 4-5 spots. I would be ok with that. A 1st and a 3rd to move up though? I would be unhappy to say the least.
 
Depends on what day you ask me but with the pick we will likely have to trade for AD; why not take that pick and trade up and get the RB we want? With AD; you got probably one elite season and maybe another 1-2 solid seasons before he is done. All of that is fine if we get a ring out of it but five years from now, AD could be out of the NFL while Gurley is the best in the league.

And if Gurley is the best in the league in 5 years he won't be resigned as the FO has demonstrated this year.
 
MURRAY ranked very low in pass protection. So mcfadden should be an upgrade immediately. I do think we go w BPA at 27. Either RB cb lb even safety. I know they've been looking at safeties early which shocks me considering how good church has played and how high they are on wilcox
 
You know what's sad?

If Randle wasn't such an immature punk, this would be his job to lose and we wouldn't be talking about throwing a first round pick at a running back. Randle was VERY good last year in comparison to his rookie season. I say cut the guy now before he wins the job in camp and then he does something else boneheaded when we are counting on him.
 
Why LB? Now
And if Gurley is the best in the league in 5 years he won't be resigned as the FO has demonstrated this year.

A lot of factors went into the decision regarding Murray, regardless he wasn't the best in the league. That's like saying Shaun Alexander was a better back than Ladanian Tomlinson because Alexander had a few seasons where he was clearly superior on paper. Tomlinson was special, Alexander was a good back in a good system where he got the ball a ton...sound familiar?
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,162
Messages
14,516,925
Members
24,208
Latest member
CowboysQC
Back
Top