Hardy Suspension Reduced to 4 games *Merge*

Status
Not open for further replies.
jwitten82 said:
But im smarter and quicker than the both of yall......lol jk
Click to expand...

Impossible. You're a TE named jwitten82. You may be able to catch BBs in the dark and if you said that, I'd probably believe you, but no way are you outrunning us. That's just not possible.

:laugh:
 
Rogah said:
You seem unaware that the majority opinion outside this forum is that Hardy is guilty. There are no circumstances by which Hardy is "going to look like an innocent guy" to the rest of the populace.
Click to expand...

the mob is the best place to make judgments. while you might like to speak for others, you don't get to. That last statement certainly applies to yourself though.

I love people that think that everyone else thinks just like them. I guess that is what is easy for me. very few people think like I do so I can avoid that particular hubris.
 
AsthmaField said:
I'm sure they're saying 2 games for the guns and 2 games for the DV = 4 games.

With the 10 games, the NFL was saying he put his hands on her 4 times (2 games each = 8), and had the guns (2 more games) to make 10.

On appeal, they said they shouldn't count him putting his hands on her as 4 separate incidents, and that it should be seen as 1 incident. So that would be 2 games. Then, 2 more for the guns = 4

That is my guess anyway.
Click to expand...

Yeah that is probably what happened.
 
ABQCOWBOY said:
Impossible. You're a TE named jwitten82. You may be able to catch BBs in the dark and if you said that, I'd probably believe you, but no way are you outrunning us. That's just not possible.

:laugh:
Click to expand...

Yeah, ABQ is right.. I was a DB/LB. No way a TE out runs me.

@jwitten82
 
Rogah said:
You seem unaware that the majority opinion outside this forum is that Hardy is guilty. There are no circumstances by which Hardy is "going to look like an innocent guy" to the rest of the populace.
Click to expand...

Anyone that reads the facts agrees there's a strong argument for reasonable doubt, internet lawyer.
 
pugilist said:
assuming he accepts the 4 games, just looking at the schedule:

Giants @ home = divisional game, giants always play us pretty tough at home. Push
@ Philly = another divisional game, stomped them last year in Philly, don't see why we can't do it again.. plus I think Chip Kelly is a farce. Win
Falcons @ home = Win
@ Saints = Loss

I'll take 2-2, possibly 3-1 depending on the Giants game with no Hardy and no McClain
Click to expand...

We beat the Saints 38 - 17 last year. This year we arguably have a much better team. IMO, I don't see us losing to the Saints.
 
I bet the Cowboys are already thrilled, but they may still go for more.
 
Rogah said:
Agreed. I think the league is happy with this. They get to look tough on DV which is all they care about.

Going to court for Hardy is riskier than people think. It might be best to just take the 4 at the start of the season than risk missing games later.
Click to expand...

How is it riskier?
 
Rogah said:
You seem unaware that the majority opinion outside this forum is that Hardy is guilty. There are no circumstances by which Hardy is "going to look like an innocent guy" to the rest of the populace.
Click to expand...

Prove this! You always make these broad statements without an ounce of proof. Unless that majority is in you head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

... and 123 more.
Total: 4,837 (members: 223, guests: 4,614)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,612
Messages
13,822,074
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top