Manwiththeplan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,350
- Reaction score
- 7,848
The judgment did not address the guilt or innocence of Brady, only the fairness of the appeals process. If I'm Goodell, I'm doing anything I can to dump my power to be judge/jury/appeals judge...it has made him/the league look really bad. But, Goodell being Goodell, he won't.
I don't see why it's suspicious, the judge did everything short of announce to the world he was siding with Brady.
Far more damaging than a venal commissioner, IMO.
I disagree, while the Pats and Brady are unpopular among most fans, the league ended up looking worse. Most players and people who covered the league ended up siding with the Pats once more details emerged.
This is the crux of the outcome. It doesn't have anything to do with guilt or innocence -- in fact, the Judge declined to rule or even reach Brady's other claims with regard to the public perception part of the case.
The ruling was solely on the procedure of the arbitration and the lack of proper notice.
For that reason, I strongly believe Greg Hardy's suspension would be reduced to a maximum of 2 games if he were to take his to court. I think there is a chance that a judge could vacate his suspension entirely if the NFLPA makes an argument for constructive suspension for him missing the previous year as well.
I disagree, while the Pats and Brady are unpopular among most fans, the league ended up looking worse. Most players and people who covered the league ended up siding with the Pats once more details emerged.
BOTTOM LINE.
Players can do anything - beat kids, beat women, cheat, pretty much everything except commit murder - and the United States legal system will get them out of it.
Dude, it's so patently and unquestionably clear that Brady was guilty, it's not even worthy of discussion.
He did it. Period.
I've never said otherwise
or...and here's a novel idea, the NFL can stick to the punishments that they all agreed upon.
Nonetheless, an obvious systemic cheater from the dirtiest team in the modern era lies to the league and the public and is not held accountable. Far more damaging than a venal commissioner, IMO.
There's not an "agreed upon" penalty for conduct detrimental to the integrity of the game.
Especially when Guido had $10K on the Colts.
Exactly. This isn't a Judge saying Brady didn't cheat. Its a judge saying that the NFL totally botched its arbitration. I wouldn't be surprised if they had done this process correctly, that a neutral arbiter would have vacated all punishment because a league has to come down hard on things that effect the integrity of the game. But you have to have a reasonable logical thought out process, and the NFL hasn't been using one of those since at least Ray Rice.
It feels like, at the least, an arbiter with no prior connection to either players or management should be put in to over hear all appeals cases. Preferably someone with ample experience. Harold Henderson isn't an independent arbiter. Neither is Goodell. Make the process more logical and you probably stop losing every time you walk into a court.
Geez.
The owners TOLD Goodell to do this. Everything he does is by their instruction. He works and reports directly to them.
Which is what stuns me, continuously. The NFL employs the most incompetent team of legal advisors on internal/administrative matters I've seen in recent memory. I've only been around the legal profession for 5 years and I could do a better job advising Goodell on how to do investigations, discipline, and appeals hearings.