News: Garrett Explains Why Weeden, Offense Didn’t Take More Down-Field Shots

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
53,028
Reaction score
25,008
Garrett Explains Why Weeden, Offense Didn’t Take More Down-Field Shots
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/2...den-offense-didn’t-take-more-down-field-shots





...“You have to understand what their style of defense is,” Garrett said of the Falcons. “They commit a lot of people to the line of scrimmage and then their corners play high. If you can picture Seattle’s corners how they play high and deep. Not many people make a lot of big plays. That’s the style of defense. So they help themselves that way by making it difficult for you to run the football and equally make it challenging for you to make big plays in the passing game. There were some opportunities to throw the ball outside to the outside receivers that we didn’t take full advantage of. To say we should’ve thrown it down the field more, I don’t know that’s accurate.”

When asked why the ball simply wasn’t thrown more to the outside, again Garrett defended his quarterback.

“We’ll evaluate quarterback decision-making but there are opportunities to throw the ball out there,” Garrett said. “He made some different decisions, threw the ball inside and was effective. The guy threw four incompletions the whole game so he did a good job helping us move the football but as much as anything else you got behind the chains a little bit in the second half and weren’t able to get back on track like we needed to convert those third downs.”

Third-down efficiency was a problem for the Cowboys all day, converting just one of six attempts. Meanwhile the Falcons were 9-14 on third-down attempts...
 
'To say we should’ve thrown it down the field more, I don’t know that’s accurate'.....'you got behind the chains a little bit in the second half and weren’t able to get back on track like we needed to convert those third downs'...

Okay, don't throw the ball downfield, but convert third downs. JG reverted to his former self last Sunday.
 
We could have at least tried more intermediate stuff outside, instead of all those dinks and dunks that went nowhere in the 2nd half. Whether it was the staff that got too conservative or Weeden that did so, the timid passing game failed almost as miserably as our running game and the cushiony, laid-back defense in the last half -- (sigh.)
 
Last edited:
Garrett Explains Why Weeden, Offense Didn’t Take More Down-Field Shots
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/2015/09/28/garrett-explains-why-weeden-offense-didn’t-take-more-down-field-shots

...“You have to understand what their style of defense is,” Garrett said of the Falcons. “They commit a lot of people to the line of scrimmage and then their corners play high. If you can picture Seattle’s corners how they play high and deep. Not many people make a lot of big plays. That’s the style of defense. So they help themselves that way by making it difficult for you to run the football and equally make it challenging for you to make big plays in the passing game. There were some opportunities to throw the ball outside to the outside receivers that we didn’t take full advantage of. To say we should’ve thrown it down the field more, I don’t know that’s accurate.”

When asked why the ball simply wasn’t thrown more to the outside, again Garrett defended his quarterback.

“We’ll evaluate quarterback decision-making but there are opportunities to throw the ball out there,” Garrett said. “He made some different decisions, threw the ball inside and was effective. The guy threw four incompletions the whole game so he did a good job helping us move the football but as much as anything else you got behind the chains a little bit in the second half and weren’t able to get back on track like we needed to convert those third downs.”

Third-down efficiency was a problem for the Cowboys all day, converting just one of six attempts. Meanwhile the Falcons were 9-14 on third-down attempts...

so garrett...when weeden about wet himself cause he was being chased towards the end of the game, and he chose to do the ONE THING you pound out of a rookie to NOT DO is slide, keeping the clock going at the worst possible time...

please...defend that decision.
 
Who was supposed to get open and then make those catches out there? Was there time to let the plays develop? The few times Weeden held onto the ball he got sacked or flushed out of the pocket. Everybody played poorly in the second half.....
 
Garrett Explains Why Weeden, Offense Didn’t Take More Down-Field Shots
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/2015/09/28/garrett-explains-why-weeden-offense-didn’t-take-more-down-field-shots





...“You have to understand what their style of defense is,” Garrett said of the Falcons. “They commit a lot of people to the line of scrimmage and then their corners play high. If you can picture Seattle’s corners how they play high and deep. Not many people make a lot of big plays. That’s the style of defense. So they help themselves that way by making it difficult for you to run the football and equally make it challenging for you to make big plays in the passing game. There were some opportunities to throw the ball outside to the outside receivers that we didn’t take full advantage of. To say we should’ve thrown it down the field more, I don’t know that’s accurate.”

When asked why the ball simply wasn’t thrown more to the outside, again Garrett defended his quarterback.

“We’ll evaluate quarterback decision-making but there are opportunities to throw the ball out there,” Garrett said. “He made some different decisions, threw the ball inside and was effective. The guy threw four incompletions the whole game so he did a good job helping us move the football but as much as anything else you got behind the chains a little bit in the second half and weren’t able to get back on track like we needed to convert those third downs.”

Third-down efficiency was a problem for the Cowboys all day, converting just one of six attempts. Meanwhile the Falcons were 9-14 on third-down attempts...

He threw easy completions. Not what we needed to win the game.
 
Only 4 incomplete passes. Of course, they'll let you complete passes, as long as you don't convert them to 1st downs.
What a crock of an excuse in general, does he just not hear what he says out loud? Even little kids lie better to their parents than he's attempting to lie to the public.
 
Then why didn't we see the RB wheel route up the sidelines with Dunbar..........clear the WR on a slant which will pull the single high safety along.......and walla--you have Dunbar 1 on 1 with a LB up the sidelines again as in the past 2 games...........run it with Dunbar, run it with DMac
 
Well, that was only 2 points -- we lost by 11. There's plenty of blame to go around.
 
I heard this when he said it. It was crap then, and still crap a day later. If they honestly don't think it was a problem and repeat the game plan Sunday, they will lose.
 
If not for the game that I watched on Sunday, I would totally believe every word Jason.
 
I have a hard time getting excited about his "efficiency" when he completed 12 of his 22 passes to the running backs. This pass has a degree of difficulty barely above handing the ball off to the backs.

Not impressed with only 4 incompletions. Any college QB could complete the majority of these passes.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,555
Messages
14,545,411
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top