Mortensen: Elliott Suspension Upheld **merged**

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
Not sure what constitutes "kangaroo court" but I feel like the answer to these questions are:

1. Yes

2. Yes.

Trivia time - the word "Kangaroo" was allegedly coined by Captain Cook's crew when they first hit Australia. One of Cook's crew pointed at a Kangaroo and asked an Aboriginal Australian what it was. The Aborigini said "Kangaroo", which means "I have no idea what you are saying"
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
24,465
Reaction score
7,526
Not sure what constitutes "kangaroo court" but I feel like the answer to these questions are:

1. Yes

2. Yes.

The answer to 2 is TBD. I cannot remember another case where no charges, numerous people saying complainant is not believable but NFL did own investigation to find guilt.
 

Philmonroe

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,587
Reaction score
4,968
Gimme a break man....'I shudder at how he'll spend that time'. Do you really erod? Lots of things make me shudder these days, but how EE will spend his time while suspended isn't one of them. He needs to grow up and get his S%!t together. You need to get your priorities straight IMHO. I love football and the Cowboys but if he can't get his act together, life and this team will go on. Hopefully he'll realize that while he's suspended and stay on the straight and narrow. Part of that process is being more selective with the company he keeps.
Man people love grandstanding and I don't get it. That guy must've wanted to be an actor with those dramatics. I shudder please. I feel about it like you do. Hope he doesn't find himself in this trouble again but if does NFL life will go on. I'm just not for the faux moral outrage.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,058
Reaction score
27,394
Man people love grandstanding and I don't get it. That guy must've wanted to be an actor with those dramatics. I shudder please. I feel about it like you do. Hope he doesn't find himself in this trouble again but if does NFL life will go on. I'm just not for the faux moral outrage.

With erod it is really simple. He predicted Zeke would fail at this for the reason that he states, article 46 is all powerful, and so now he goes around parroting the exact same thing and looking for anyone who agrees with him. He's been doing it for a month or more. I don't expect he will stop no matter the new information we get.

First is to point out that he is not a reliable witness. The Mike and Mike attorney he keeps referring to said he would get the restraining order.

We just heard the judge in this case say that this was not like Brady and how he had serious issues with the fairness of the proceedings that went against Zeke and at the end of the day he, not Mike or Steve or, Bill will be making the judgment. It really shouldn't take a lawyer to understand that hiding evidence is not fair.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
The answer to 2 is TBD. I cannot remember another case where no charges, numerous people saying complainant is not believable but NFL did own investigation to find guilt.

I can see that point of view but, if that is the point of view you take, then you also have to say that 1 is also, TBD.
 

Silver N Blue

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,295
Reaction score
8,814
Trivia time - the word "Kangaroo" was allegedly coined by Captain Cook's crew when they first hit Australia. One of Cook's crew pointed at a Kangaroo and asked an Aboriginal Australian what it was. The Aborigini said "Kangaroo", which means "I have no idea what you are saying"
So you are telling me after all these years...Captain Kangaroo's morning show before school was completely useless....:) What a simpler life it was back then.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
24,465
Reaction score
7,526
I can see that point of view but, if that is the point of view you take, then you also have to say that 1 is also, TBD.

No, because it clearly was a kangaroo court. The NFL ignored evidence, its investigators, basically said he was guilty even when law enforcement said she was full of it. The Supreme Kangaroo Court of the NFL was constituted just to find guilt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court

Whether or not the CBA allows the Supreme Kangaroo Court of the NFL to act as it does, is to be determined.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
24,465
Reaction score
7,526
Trivia time - the word "Kangaroo" was allegedly coined by Captain Cook's crew when they first hit Australia. One of Cook's crew pointed at a Kangaroo and asked an Aboriginal Australian what it was. The Aborigini said "Kangaroo", which means "I have no idea what you are saying"

as cool as that story is, sadly, it is untrue

http://www.yourdictionary.com/kangaroo
 

ThreeandOut

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
4,213
No, because it clearly was a kangaroo court. The NFL ignored evidence, its investigators, basically said he was guilty even when law enforcement said she was full of it. The Supreme Kangaroo Court of the NFL was constituted just to find guilt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court

Whether or not the CBA allows the Supreme Kangaroo Court of the NFL to act as it does, is to be determined.

Someone needs to edit the Wikipedia to add Zeke's case as an example.
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
No, because it clearly was a kangaroo court. The NFL ignored evidence, its investigators, basically said he was guilty even when law enforcement said she was full of it. The Supreme Kangaroo Court of the NFL was constituted just to find guilt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kangaroo_court

Whether or not the CBA allows the Supreme Kangaroo Court of the NFL to act as it does, is to be determined.

So basically, sounds as if you are saying exactly what I am. I don't get the "No" part but whatever. I'm satisfied that we are basically saying the same thing.
 

CanadianCowboysFan

Lightning Rod
Messages
24,465
Reaction score
7,526
So basically, sounds as if you are saying exactly what I am. I don't get the "No" part but whatever. I'm satisfied that we are basically saying the same thing.

No is in reference to you stating that 1 has to be TBD if 2 is TBD. I say no that is not the case. Yes to 1 as it is a kangaroo court. 2 is TBD
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,058
Reaction score
27,394
That doubly funny because I heard that from a guy from Australia.

Australians like to mess with Americans about their culture. I had one tell me that if one wanted to get a joey, you had to go and club the mama roo and steal it.

I love their sense of humor over there.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
Australians like to mess with Americans about their culture. I had one tell me that if one wanted to get a joey, you had to go and club the mama roo and steal it.

I love their sense of humor over there.

I've gotten addicted to a Podcast called "Mysterious Universe" where two really bright, really funny Aussie guys go into topics like Near Death Experiences and Cryptozoology. One is Life Science (I think he is an immunologist) and the other Physical Science (something like ME). They rip on the frauds, tell wacky stories and go into the similarities of reported stories and what it could mean. Its like having two Aussie friends that show up at your bar that just read six books they want to tell you about.
 

ConceptCoop

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,440
Reaction score
1,642
Given that the justice here clearly distinguished between this case and the Brady case what precedent would that be? The only other case would be Rice who was punished for DV and he had his suspension vacated by the court.

That was in November 2014. The conduct policy was revised in December 2014.

He's serving 6 games, whether it happens this year or next. I'll gladly give even odds up to a couple hundred bucks to anyone who thinks otherwise and wants to make some money.
 

ConceptCoop

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,440
Reaction score
1,642
There's one thing this case doesn't have that those other cases did, though: evidence.

;)

How can one prove a negative? There is no proof that Zeke didn't put his hands on the woman in question. The league saw enough evidence of wrong doing to act on it--and that's all they need. The NFLPA granted the league that power. There simply aren't grounds to sue here. If anyone really thinks conspiracy angle is going to hold up--good luck with that. It's a Hail Mary and nothing more.
 
Top