It just is not true - he was not more accurate - 65% to 61% is not even close enough to argue. Aikman had a better running game and better oline protection for the majority of his career and his stats are not close. The game was a bit different but not enough to bring about a 4% difference
Wrong. Aikman was more accurate when it mattered. He's considered one of the most accurate passers in POST SEASON HISTORY! Something Tony couldn't do because he wasn't accurate in Game 16s many years. Forget the oline and running game, Troy played in an era where there was press coverage and mauling of receivers every play. The game Romo played where it was soft zone and patty cake with WRs isn't even the same.
http://www.profootballhof.com/players/troy-aikman/highlights/
Super Bowl Records
[1st] Highest Completion Percentage, Career - 70.0
[2nd] Lowest Percentage, Passes Intercepted, Career -
1.25
[Tied for 2nd] Most Consecutive Completions, Game -
10 (SB XXX, vs. Pittsburgh)
[Tied for 3rd] Most Touchdown Passes, Game -
4 (SB XXVII, vs. Buffalo)
Post-Season Records
[2nd] Longest Pass Completion -
94 (to Alvin Harper, vs. Green Bay, 1994)
[3rd] Highest Completion Percentage, Career - 63.8
[Tied for 3rd] Most Games, 300 or More Yards Passing, Career -
4
[Tied for 3rd] Most Consecutive Games, 300 or More Yards Passing -
2 (1994)
[Tied for 3rd] Most Touchdown Passes, Game -
4 (SB XXVII, vs. Buffalo)
If I get to choose Jimmy Johnson over Garrett, I choose Johnson. I choose Aikmans Oline and Emmitt Smith too. I'll take any of his defenses as well.
I'd also take Aikman and throw him into Romo's era where you passed 40 times a games with limp defense.
And I'm a Romo fan too. The arguments are just lame