And Dak Pamperers can find anything that Dak does while, where the won't blame anything on Dak and lay blame on everyone else, but then give him the credit for any win. And the thing about people carrying Dak is a valid cause of concern, plainly illustrated by 3-5 without Coop 7-1 with coop. Now apparently we not allowed to have concern about things because it will automatically be a double standard. The simple truth is like Romo, Dak has his flaws. People had a right to have concerns about Romo, because of his flaws. People have a right to have concerns about Dak, because of his flaw. And heck, he is an unproven quarterback. People can keep trying to put pampers on him and come up with all sorts of excuses, and refuse to see anything negative about their baby, but well other people across the nation are seeing these same things and mentioning them as well. It's not like it is just Cowboys fans who are saying these things about Dak. It not like members of the national media aren't saying the same things.
Without Cooper, you mean like how the majority of QBs outside of Brady, won't be able to have just any average WR/TE/RB plugged into their offensive system and still be productive enough, to make his team a playoff/Superbowl contender. And even in that case, Brady benefited greatly from having Belechick as a coach and a front office who constantly knows how to place and keep talent on the team. to make the Patriots Superbowl contenders every season.
Look at Luck, he just happens to have a great bounce back season, during a season where his Oline happens to be one of the best in the NFL, when it comes to protecting the QB and not giving up many Sacks. As well as having a solid running game.
Most QBs need top weapons around him and all QBs benefit from a true number one WR threat, this isn't a revelation that is limited to Dak. Once again, in the need to criticize Dak, while campaigning for the QB you support, there are things you overlook, either willingly or unintentionally.
Using Cooper, Zeke and the current Cowboys talented roster to say that Dak is "carried". Since you support Foles coming to the team, tell me how many teams he led to the playoffs outside of Philly. What team besides Philly was he ever close to winning a Superbowl with. Foles struggled so much outside of Philly, that no team kept him as their starting QB. If they saw a true franchise QB in Foles. Then those teams wouldn't have release him.
Now Foles goes to a team with an upgrade in coaching and a team with superior talented, with superior weapons, and a superior supporting cast. Along with a superior put together offensive system and he thrives. Is this supposed to just be a coincidence that Foles best career is where the coaching and supporting cast is better than on the other teams he has been on. Yet, it's Dak who gets discredited for the supporting cast around him, while other QBs that you support, get all of the credit, despite the talented supporting cast.
"Dak Pamperers, Dak-a-Zoids, Dak Sniffers, Dak Slobbers" As usual some on this board resort to name calling, because not everyone agrees with their Anti-Dak views.
I knew Big Ben was going to be great the first time I saw him. I thought the same thing about Dak the first time I saw him too. But Big Ben won a superbowl his second year, so it boggles the mind that someone is saying that Dak is somehow ahead of where Big Ben was. I mean people bring up stats, but superbowl wins trump those, especially if you can how see those quarterback perform well in the big game. Some of these stats and claims seem meaningless without having earn your name by winning the most important games.
