I'm not championing Moore for OC, but neither am I dismissing him outright simply because he doesn't have x amount of experience. Someone, I don't remember who, asked the question how do you know when one has enough experience. The answer is you never do for sure and it varies from individual to individual. Also, did McVeigh NEED 6 years as an assistant position coach or did it just take that long for someone to be willing to take the risk?
But if one believes the OC needs more coaching experience, and that's fine, wouldn't that then also exclude Tony Romo? Yet many on here clamor for that, even to be HC. And I believe many are at the same time vehemently against Moore.
What I'm expecting is for the FO to do what any business does when searching for talent. Codify what it is they want from the position and then conduct a thorough interview to determine whether a candidate can deliver those needs. Personally, I would be looking for the candidate to bring fresh ideas, not necessarily a totally new playbook, whether I felt those ideas were inline with what I wanted and needed, and whether that individual could mesh with the existing personnel.
The biggest risk to me with Kellen Moore isn't his inexperience, but that he's currently inhouse. In my 35 years of middle and executive management, I was very wary of promoting from within because of the chance of becoming stagnant or myopic. But there is a risk to bringing in from outside as well - it's a balance.
Personally, the one individual I would not want is Josh McDaniels. I have zero confidence that he can or will be effective outside of NE. He wouldn't have Brady or Belichick here.