Beasley sounds off on offense again

[Ranching]

Such a bad guy. Like the rest of us, he thinks the coaching and the offense stinks. At least he has the guts to come out and say it. That big receiver that left last year basically said the same thing. Dez said the same thing.

Players outside the organization have said how easy this offense is to scout. How predictable. Then you can see it with your eyes. At what point do some people just finally admit that the offensive coaches on this team suck?

The receiver that left was cut, this idiot is being diva. Do you think he's really in high demand?

 

[khiladi]

Calling people dak homers is asinine.
Do you not root for the quarterback of your team?

People did it to Dez.. you can also root for the team by admitting the QB sucks and we should get a better one.

 

[darthseinfeld]

That's exactly where I think he ends up. Heck, guys like Wes Welker and Edelman are the reason why Dallas looked at a guy like Beasley in the first place.

I don't NE looking at him when they pay someone alot less

 

[khiladi]

It’s also pretty amusing because Beasley specifically addressed this notion that he was targeted. He basically said don’t be deceived by targets. because most of it was the two-minute drill.

Again, this actually absolves Linehan to some degree..

Like I said, this organization is a cluster F.

 

[DCBoysfan]

It’s been real Beas, good luck moving forward.

 

[windward]

Beasley should go elsewhere. He’s just gonna fall farther down the totem pole. He deserves to be more than just a bit player. In the right spot, he could make 60-80 catches.

LOL. He had 65 catches here.

 

[Rayman70]

GOOD luck with your next stop Cole. Sorry you feel the need to talk smack publicly. Your not wrong, but I just wish you would have showed better judgment and kept this private, IN HOUSE. IF a guy wants out of town, this is a "how to" step by step 101.

 

[windward]

Cough Amari Cooper cough

It’s not fair if you bring up the evidence that directly refuted his point, now.

 

[boysfaninMI]

Like a fart in the wind. He has some valid points but airing it out on twitter is gutless and pointless. That goes for all walks of life and politics.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Well per Dak homers he should have been the number 1, because Dak utilized him properly...

But that’s not true anyways, because they team said they didn’t need a number 1 including Dak. The whole idea of number 1 was brushed aside by everybody in this organization and this whole idea of Dak friendly is that he “spreads the gall around”. They tried to do this by riding on the baseless claim that Dez was trying to force Dak to throw him the ball.

It was Allen Hurns who Dallas got to supposedly play in Dez’s role not Coke Beasley. Most Dak homers said he’d do just fine. I love how that one worked out. Dallas didn’t make Beasley a number 1, what they did is experimented with some routes to get him out wide.

Beasley was getting the most targets on the team which made him....the #1 option?

Can you talk football without bringing up the "Dak homers"? Goodness. Be a adult and debate. The pettiness is just that. Petty.

 

[TheCount]

People did it to Dez.. you can also root for the team by admitting the QB sucks and we should get a better one.

I'm not really sure what you gain from this.

Do you believe Jerry is stalking the forums for clues on what to do about Dak?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Perhaps by telling Garrett what he expects through the week prior? Seems obvious. No one says Jerry calls plays during the game, but it is not a stretch that he tells his puppet what he wants to see happen during the week in meetings.

So put me in the mind of Jerry. He tells Garrett....."Look, throw all the targets to Gallup and Cooper.......don't attacks he middle of the field with Beasley...."?

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I'm not really sure what you gain from this.

Do you believe Jerry is stalking the forums for clues on what to do about Dak?

I think that's their motivation. Say Dak sucks as much as they can so they can believe it and Jerry believes....but Jerry isn't letting Dak go anywhere. He knows what life is like without a quarterback no matter what flaws people think he has. They can easily be a Clint Stoerner or Drew Henson away.

 

[khiladi]

Beasley was getting the most targets on the team which made him....the #1 option?

Can you talk football without bringing up the "Dak homers"? Goodness. Be a adult and debate. The pettiness is just that. Petty.

That’s not the definition of “number 1” and your just flop-flopping around it. The FO and Dak said they didn’t need a number 1 and Dak just needs to throw it to who is open.

And BTW, if that’s the qualification of number 1 option, based on targets, than Beasley was pretty damn good. Clearly you opened your mouth before checking the completion percentage on his targets, including a 9 for 11 performance against the Jaguars or his 7 for 8 targets in the opener against the Giants.

Not sure how he failed as a number 1 if the definition is by targets..

 

[khiladi]

I'm not really sure what you gain from this.

Do you believe Jerry is stalking the forums for clues on what to do about Dak?

Do you believe Jerry is stalking this forum for clues regarding anything football related?

 

[Daktozekecoop]

Those are the words of an unhappy man. He could easily be the Wes Welker, Julian Edelman of this team. Dak is the man to do it, with a proper game plan. Is Moore the guy? I don't know.
But I have no doubt that with New England, Cole lights it up.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

That’s not the definition of “number 1” and your just flop-flopping around it. The FO and Dak said they didn’t need a number 1 and Dak just needs to throw it to who is open.

And BTW, if that’s the qualification of number 1 option, based on targets, than Beasley was pretty damn good. Clearly you opened your mouth before checking the completion percentage on his targets, including a 9 for 11 performance against the Jaguars or his 7 for 8 targets in the opener against the Giants.

Not sure how he failed as a number 1 if the definition is by targets..

Ok and they didn't get open so then what? And your #1 is your #1 option. What are you even arguing? Beasley was their best receiver and he was their #1 option earlier in the season. They wanted it to be Allen Hurns....didn't turn out that way. Beasley failed as a #1. You can bring up the Jaguars game if you want to.

 

[Iago33]

How many times are we going to hear our players complain about our coaches and still question if the players are stupid? Some of you Garrett boys...

He didn’t say anything about the coaches....

 

[CF74]

See I don't get the fan outrage at veteran players speaking their mind.

These guys are having their careers wasted by Jason Garrett and his trash offense that he imposes on them have every right to say something when they have the skins on the wall that they do.

It's not ok for a Rookie but when you have the long list of guys including Witten venting his frustrations on MNF this past season then I think we should listen instead of bashing them.

Yeah this is what you call a Majority View man.. People are going to let passions cloud reason.. It’s always 1-2 different extremes..

Anyways MeShawn, T-O, Marty B, Dez, Witten, Butler, Coooop, Beasley, even Mr 4th and Long what’s his face, all have called our offense garbage. The Ravens Defense, Seattles Defense, Giants, Broncos, etc..

But Beasley quit when he was a rookie, so fans hold grudges, just people being people lol

 

[percyhoward]

You can also root for the team by admitting the QB sucks and we should get a better one.

Win-win.