Andy Isabella

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
66,924
Reaction score
84,287
What do you guys think?

He’s definitely hard to stop when the ball is in his hands.

He can get the edge on end arounds too.

Quick and I’m guessing he’s got good top speed too. It looks like it anyways.
 

Keithfansince5

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,534
Reaction score
5,644
Would be better than Beasley as our slot guy. His hands are suspect at times but he is very fast and strong.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,835
Reaction score
9,053
Dudes a stud.

He’d be a good mid round target as a replacement for Beas if we let him walk.

Ideally, if we target a a lot guy they’ll have some return ability.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
66,924
Reaction score
84,287
Dudes a stud.

He’d be a good mid round target as a replacement for Beas if we let him walk.

Ideally, if we target a a lot guy they’ll have some return ability.


He can do a lot of things that teams value now days so I wonder how high he goes.

3rd?
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,835
Reaction score
9,053
He can do a lot of things that teams value now days so I wonder how high he goes.

3rd?

WRs under 5’10 usually don’t go until the 4th or so. Switzer was the earliest drafted the last 2 years and he was the 4th.

Isabellla is a better prospect IMO, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he broke the trend and was taken as early as the 3rd.
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
66,924
Reaction score
84,287
WRs under 5’10 usually don’t go until the 4th or so. Switzer was the earliest drafted the last 2 years and he was the 4th.

Isabellla is a better prospect IMO, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he broke the trend and was taken as early as the 3rd.

Yeah.

It just looks like he can do all the gadget stuff as well as be a legit slot guy and even go outside.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,234
Reaction score
43,941
Dude is tailor-made for the Patriots to take at the backend of Round 1; Edelman is slowing down and they are talent poor at the position.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,835
Reaction score
9,053
Yeah.

It just looks like he can do all the gadget stuff as well as be a legit slot guy and even go outside.

I’d like us to keep Austin for just that reason, but agree he’s a good player for the quick throws.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,836
Reaction score
16,637
He can do a lot of things that teams value now days so I wonder how high he goes.

3rd?
We might have to take him in the 2nd round if we want him. I like our receivers but he and/or Penny could help.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,330
Reaction score
48,172
He can do a lot of things that teams value now days so I wonder how high he goes.

3rd?
I'd prefer to not drop a 3rd on him. But if he's still there later, then maybe so.
He's pretty dynamic
 

Mr_437

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,910
Reaction score
18,817
Keep in mind DAL may have to draft prospects a round earlier due to their draft slot.

Isabella has RAC ability possibly better than anybody on DAL roster due to his acceleration and low center of gravity (legs like JJ Barea).

Also, like his explosion off his plant foot to create separation.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,234
Reaction score
43,941
That would be shocking.

It’s all relative to the offense you run. The slot has always been a critical position in their offense (Troy Brown, Welker, and Edelman). I’m not making it a GORICO stone-cold lock but it wouldn’t shock me one bit.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,835
Reaction score
9,053
Keep in mind DAL may have to draft prospects a round earlier due to their draft slot.

Isabella has RAC ability possibly better than anybody on DAL roster due to his acceleration and low center of gravity (legs like JJ Barea).

Also, like his explosion off his plant foot to create separation.

Isabella in the 2nd would be awful value IMO. 3rd maybe, but you can find slot dudes later in the draft.
 

Mr_437

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,910
Reaction score
18,817
Isabella in the 2nd would be awful value IMO. 3rd maybe, but you can find slot dudes later in the draft.
Agreed. No need to take a slot in the 2nd... I'd prefer some sort of lineman.
 

NeonNinja

Dash28
Messages
16,927
Reaction score
14,443
Plenty of room on the bandwagon. I’m the driver though.

Hart looks good too.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,330
Reaction score
48,172
It’s all relative to the offense you run. The slot has always been a critical position in their offense (Troy Brown, Welker, and Edelman). I’m not making it a GORICO stone-cold lock but it wouldn’t shock me one bit.
You're right, I guess nobody knows for sure.

I will say this
  • They drafted Edelman in the 7th round
  • They drafted Brown in the 8th round
  • Welker went undrafted but after playing vs the Pats for several years in Miami, the Pats gave up the 60th pick for him a as proven commodity. Even then he got a tiny contract at first
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
66,924
Reaction score
84,287
Agreed. No need to take a slot in the 2nd... I'd prefer some sort of lineman.


Yeah i'm fine with a lineman too.

It's just going to be picked over quite a bit at that point. Teams reach for lineman now days and these guys that are good rarely hit free agency.


Dak needs protection but he also needs that great slot guy / TE to be his best as a QB.

Also, an interior Pass Rush guy would be nice to have.

I wouldn't have a problem with a DB either.
 
Top