MWH1967
The Cook
- Messages
- 7,090
- Reaction score
- 9,410
The 90's Cowboys was about rotation. keep em fresh.Winning teams are built around play makers. Just sayin'.
The 90's Cowboys was about rotation. keep em fresh.Winning teams are built around play makers. Just sayin'.
Not saying we are better off without Tank.Greagory and Quinn are RDE’s, Lawrence is a very good LDE.
If we loose Lawrence then we are worse off in several different ways( not just on the field either).
Quinn's signing doesn’t change that.
The 90's Cowboys was about rotation. keep em fresh.
you think Richard and Marrinelli are inferior coaches?You lost me at, "with our coaches"...
The signing of Quinn is a huge move by the Cowboys to end the stalemate with Tank.
Lawrence never thought the Cowboys could replace him and therefore has taken his stance.
But it appears to me that signing Quinn to a $11 /mil a yr deal has shifted everything.
I do not believe the rhetoric from the FO about just wanting to pair Quinn and Tank.
Sure..if it happens fine.
But think about if it does not.
Also think about Tank playing again on the Franchise Tag at $20 mil/yr this season and still awaiting his new contract.
If Quinn suddenly starts have a lights out season and has better sack numbers than Tank..
well he only has a 1 year deal with us and then Tank has competition for his contract.
Quinn has had better sack numbers than Tank in the past.
That is what we would want.
So let this play it's way out.
Worst case scenario we rescind the Tag and keep the money and pay Quinn instead and can redo our other guys easily with the savings.
We win as a team no matter what happens.
Winning teams make adjustments. If the need arises, the Cowboys FO is prepared to move on from DLawWinning teams are built around play makers. Just sayin'.
The signing of Quinn is a huge move by the Cowboys to end the stalemate with Tank.
Lawrence never thought the Cowboys could replace him and therefore has taken his stance.
But it appears to me that signing Quinn to a $11 /mil a yr deal has shifted everything.
I do not believe the rhetoric from the FO about just wanting to pair Quinn and Tank.
Sure..if it happens fine.
But think about if it does not.
Also think about Tank playing again on the Franchise Tag at $20 mil/yr this season and still awaiting his new contract.
If Quinn suddenly starts have a lights out season and has better sack numbers than Tank..
well he only has a 1 year deal with us and then Tank has competition for his contract.
Quinn has had better sack numbers than Tank in the past.
That is what we would want.
So let this play it's way out.
Worst case scenario we rescind the Tag and keep the money and pay Quinn instead and can redo our other guys easily with the savings.
We win as a team no matter what happens.
Yes i agree with that order of position but i would include OC and possibly CB too. That being said if you could trade Lawrence and end up with a healthy Ansah and a good legit safety would that not be worth it? Add in you can resign Zeke, Dak, Cooper and possible Jones plus whatever draft capital we get i think it would be worth it.I agree for all but 3 positions. QB, DE, LT. He’s DE
Winning teams make adjustments. If the need arises, the Cowboys FO is prepared to move on from DLaw
Redball, that would be called and then raised. That's the chronological order of the betting procedure but I do not think Lawrence is going to fold.
If there's a bluff, it is that Gregory might be ready to go by game 1.
you think Richard and Marrinelli are inferior coaches?
Hardly.
I was under the impression that Richard was calling the defense.Our last 2 playoff losses can be largely credited to Marinelli getting outcoached.
Actually in real world poker it’s just “raised”. First word is considered an action. So you cant call AND raise.He got called and raised, not raised and called, geeesh.