Corso
Offseason mode... sleepy time
- Messages
- 34,634
- Reaction score
- 62,871
Start.Stop.
Talking.
Yelling.
Start.Stop.
Talking.
Comes to discussion board
Discussion occurs
Tells people to stop discussing
Just go to a different website. There's more than one.
It's production and athleticism on the graph.Whoa! Look at Rapp's placement on that SPARQ grid.
Comes to discussion board
Discussion occurs
Tells people to stop discussing
Just go to a different website. There's more than one.
Doesn't seem bothered by Rapp 40 times at all.......
For what it's worth, Broaddus seem to think, they could Rapp over Thornhill if
It's production and athleticism on the graph.
The horizontal line is the SPARQ scores, the vertical line is for college production points. It's designed to show which players were both productive and have the needed athleticism to play in the NFL.
The top right quadrant (A) contains the players who made a lot of plays in college and have desired athleticism.
The lower right quadrant (B) contains players with plus athletism but whose production wasn't where you'd expect.
The top left quadrant (C) contains productive players who don't have plus athleticism.
The lower left quadrant (D) contains the players who lacked college production and also don't have plus athleticism.
Taylor Rapp is in some bad company with the "D" crowd, but he passes the eye test with scouts. The above graph isn't an absolute, it's just something to consider in the evaluation process. I couldn't care less about Rapp's 40 time, it's of absolutely no consequence to me. His agility scores (shuttle, 3 cone) are very good, better than Juan Thornhill's, in fact.
The lack of production, however, does give some pause. Rapp (9.2) is almost two points below the desired threshold of 11.
Still, I'll be grinning ear to ear if he come away with Thornhill or Rapp come Friday night.
Finding the superior athlete: SPARQ safeties in the 2019 NFL Draft
Production: For safeties, 11.0 or more production points indicate a strong track record of college production, and anything above 14.0 is exceptional.
Athleticism: Moving on to SPARQ, our list of safeties is reduced from 22 to 20 players, as there is no Sparq data available for Deionte Thompson and JoJo McIntosch’s production is simply too low for me to bother changing the scales on the graph.
The graph below provides a visual representation of what happens when we plot production points against the SPARQ score for the 2019 safety class.
I’m with you @darthseinfeld. It’s a great pick if we land either
Notice the lack of any detail. Just the generic "film is important" mantra he's heard real scouts talk about.
Our Director of Personnel.
Generic, vanilla talk, designed to NOT reveal a lean. Right?
Film is important. Perspective is even more important.Notice the lack of any detail. Just the generic "film is important" mantra he's heard real scouts talk about.
Our Director of Personnel.
I entrust this kind of analysis to you very good folk.It's production and athleticism on the graph.
The horizontal line is the SPARQ scores, the vertical line is for college production points. It's designed to show which players were both productive and have the needed athleticism to play in the NFL.
The top right quadrant (A) contains the players who made a lot of plays in college and have desired athleticism.
The lower right quadrant (B) contains players with plus athletism but whose production wasn't where you'd expect.
The top left quadrant (C) contains productive players who don't have plus athleticism.
The lower left quadrant (D) contains the players who lacked college production and also don't have plus athleticism.
Taylor Rapp is in some bad company with the "D" crowd, but he passes the eye test with scouts. The above graph isn't an absolute, it's just something to consider in the evaluation process. I couldn't care less about Rapp's 40 time, it's of absolutely no consequence to me. His agility scores (shuttle, 3 cone) are very good, better than Juan Thornhill's, in fact.
The lack of production, however, does give some pause. Rapp (9.2) is almost two points below the desired threshold of 11.
Still, I'll be grinning ear to ear if he come away with Thornhill or Rapp come Friday night.
Not you dolts, I mean gentlemen.
Stephen should stop talking about potential draft targets.
My God, please make this madness stop.Generic, vanilla talk, designed to NOT reveal a lean. Right?
Edit: And @Alexander
Film is important. Perspective is even more important.
I don't think he has watched any more than his father did.
But hey, it is a "collective" decision.
Well, they are exactly what you would expect.I'd love to know the answer to that. How much film do those two actually watch? I believe it's only whatever's being viewed during meetings with the scouts. I don't think Frick or Frack spend a single second actually working in personnel. They sit in on meetings to feel important.
My God, please make this madness stop.
The Cowboys are one of the more transparent franchises in the NFL.
And they like it that way.
Just stop it with the "we are tricky" talk.
We couldn't be clever and secretive if we tried.