Whether you put quotation marks around the word “jump” or not doesn’t change the fact it is a conclusion made without the benefit of evidence.
As the message sender, I know exactly what I meant to convey when I put quotation marks around the word jump... ie, that it's not really one, though some, for their own reasons, appear to be determined to characterize it as one.
So, you really want to go down this road? I think it's needless, really, because... not trying to flatter you, but... you impress me as an intelligent person who knows this... but oh well, let's do it then...
There are two ways of supporting the degree to which a conclusion is a rational conclusion... empirical observation, and if-a-and-if-b-then-c logic.
Both are forms of "evidence."
In this case, we have direct information from the superiors/principals indicating that they have re-envisioned how the offensive coaching staff ought to work together... that's empirical observation... and we have the logic that says if a person's job is on the line, and if a big-rock responsibility in that person's job is X, then that person is going to be very hands-on with X, even if he had a seasoned assistant to delegate X to....
And forpetesake... let alone, if he had a rookie assistant involved in the equation.
the reality is until we see him in action over time we don’t have any direct evidence that he will either succeed or fail. So, my question still stands - why the need to reach a conclusion now?
I've apparently been misunderstood. Though I'm really not sure how, because I really thought anyway I've been pretty specific and cogent in the conclusions I've reached....
It's
indeed an open question whether the Garrett 2019 offense will succeed or fail. I've reached no conclusion on that. I'm as optimistic as the next guy, I really am.
But again... it
is Garrett's offense.
Moore will help. But he will help in the same way that you'd expect a rookie OC to help. This is not his offense, though he is an influencer, and he will be given some leash to, within boundaries that Garrett sets, do some things that otherwise might not have been done. But Kitna is also an influencer. Columbo is also an influencer. Nussmeier, too. Moore will coordinate. Garrett will supervise.... supervise, that is, in the way a person whose job is on the line would be expected to supervise.
That's the conclusion to be taken from the words of the principals and from the self-evident logic in front of our eyes.
And this really shouldn't be any surprise. Based on the Joneses' having publicly said that a rationale for lettting Linehan go is the point that top 5 offenses of-late have been the ones getting to championship games, obviously they're paying attention to what the Rams and Saints do... former OCs who are HCs who have a heavy hand in their offenses, and delegate to their OCs limited responsibilities.