Haimerej
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,083
- Reaction score
- 6,776
I don't equate it but, the point is that there is legal precedents for such cases. Business gets sued every day for things just like this. How do you hold bars responsible for drunken drivers when they can't test Blood Levels? It's not out of the question by any means.
What legal precedent? You're just pulling things out of the air and fearmongering. People can literally sue you for whatever they want. A judge can literally tell you there's no case here and throw it out.
You're also referring to established law referencing the providers of alcohol. What law are you referencing with this, "no testing means full endorsement and responsibility for consequences," stance?